-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
flesh out partial syncing / authZ restrictions #29
Labels
Comments
Good authZ article with flow: |
Condensed API guidelines: |
7 tasks
clientside
serverside
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
How to deal with partial sync / authZ restrictions?
Is it ok to have
policies
in front of the common REST-endpoints as to filter/restrict the output? Is this ok in light of http caching?Idea would be to do everything based on
json webtokens
passed along in a cookie for authenticated users. Or: (probably better) have the client fetch the cookie and pass thejson webtoken
as some sort ofauth header
, which enables the sails backend to behave as a stateless Resource server.(although it's a matter of opinion I guess why cookies would count as stateful and headers as stateless).
relates to #39 which enables post process filtering on field level
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: