You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe that because of the multiple helm upgrade commands being started all at once, when deploying the cloudbank hubs, lots of the helm upgrade commands fail with:
164 Tue Jan 28 04:16:05 2025 failed basehub-0.1.0 1.0 Upgrade "santiago" failed: client rate limiter Wait returned an error: context deadline exceeded
165 Tue Jan 28 04:29:28 2025 deployed basehub-0.1.0 1.0 Upgrade complete
The most concerning is that, in this particular case, helm even got fooled to believe that the deployment was successful, when in fact, there was no hub pod running what's so ever.
Context
Some relevant logs are below:
(base) ➜ pilot-hubs git:(main) ✗ kubectl get deployment -n santiago
NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
proxy 1/1 1 1 586d
shared-dirsize-metrics 1/1 1 1 497d
shared-volume-metrics 1/1 1 1 586d
(base) ➜ pilot-hubs git:(main) ✗ kubectl get pods -n santiago
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
proxy-55b66b8dff-9kzn7 1/1 Running 0 15d
shared-dirsize-metrics-54dbc5d848-nxflj 1/1 Running 0 115d
shared-volume-metrics-fcc697459-w696q 1/1 Running 0 264d
(base) ➜ pilot-hubs git:(main) ✗ k get events -n santiago
No resources found in santiago namespace.
Issue
I believe that because of the multiple helm upgrade commands being started all at once, when deploying the cloudbank hubs, lots of the helm upgrade commands fail with:
The most concerning is that, in this particular case, helm even got fooled to believe that the deployment was successful, when in fact, there was no hub pod running what's so ever.
Context
Some relevant logs are below:
Mitigation
Manually redeploying the hub, brought it back up
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: