Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No NSCBC Treatment for Species Terms #149

Open
whitmanscu opened this issue Apr 22, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

No NSCBC Treatment for Species Terms #149

whitmanscu opened this issue Apr 22, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@whitmanscu
Copy link

Currently, when using the NSCBC treatment for BCs in PeleC, the characteristic treatment is used for velocities, pressure and density (for outflow BCs). Species mass fractions are not changed (looking at impose_NSCBC_3d for example), imposing a zero-gradient condition instead. This is leading to crashes when simulating flames exiting a domain. Ideally, the NSCBC treatment would be expanded to include species terms and take into account source and diffusion terms for these species, including reactions. Is this something that has been discussed previously? Currently I'm finding this is a barrier for any such simulations - I've tried the FOExtrap outflow BC as a workaround but pressure reflections in reacting simulations have killed these attempts.

@emotheau
Copy link
Contributor

GC-NSCBC have been developed in the context of a non-reacting flow solver, and then ported to PeleC. So indeed, there is currently no specific treatment for reaction terms.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants