Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

changes made in response to Richard's first set of comments #1145

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 24, 2024

Conversation

pat-rogers
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Ada, just as the use of the *public*, *private*, and *protected* parts of
classes is fundamental to creating abstractions in class-oriented
languages. Not every type can be private, as illustrated by the client
expectation for array indexing in Ada prior to Ada 2012. Not every type
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding "prior to Ada 2012" here makes the uninformed reader wonder why is it now different in Ada 2012... Maybe we should come up with better examples of the necessity of non-private types.

Comment on lines +88 to +90
Now, here's the rub.

Constructor functions require that same compile-time visibility so the
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Now, here's the rub.
Constructor functions require that same compile-time visibility so the
Now, here's the problem:
constructor functions require that same compile-time visibility so the

Improving comparison with the original version.
@gusthoff gusthoff merged commit c6697df into AdaCore:master Nov 24, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants