Folks, I love and honor open software (the latter not as much as I should), and therefore I am a little ashamed of the lack of regular care I give to this project. My family (two still young kids and a wife working full-time just as me) plus my hobbies (reading - currently I read the great book "Coders at work" and plan to work my way through "Structure and interpretation of computer programs", a book many great and experienced coders say is kind of a must-read - and homebrewing) take their toll. And then there's the time I need for procrastination as well. You get the picture.
I took over this project from another guy who initially built it, because he did not respond to any PRs or emails for years and I needed a feature that was not available. And I thought there are enough people out there that should profit from what I do, so I forked the license-checker under the now pretty clumpsy name license-checker-rseidelsohn - here we are.
I am always happy when I see PR's being created by other coders out there or if someone writes me an email - no matter what it might be about. Just the feeling that this tool and what I do with it does not only live in the void is already amazing to me.
This being said, I am really looking for more people that want to contribute, so feel free if you want to be added as maintainers.
But also, I am now working for Springer Nature since mid of february, and this awesome employer (I can only and absolutely recommend working for Springer Nature, and I get no advantages whatsoever through this message - they don't even know about it!) gives their devs a 10% friday every 2nd friday, where the devs are not disturbed by any meetings and are free to work on whatever they wish (preferrably anything that helps improving their skills and/or the code base), and I plan to take this open source project and maintain it during that time. So I would like to give you hope that the updates will come more frequently and in better quality.
Berlin, 1st of April 2023.
This is a fork of davglass' license-checker v.25.0.1 - Since that code doesn't seem to be updated regularly, I created this fork for being able to adding new features and fixing bugs.
I changed the original exclude argument to excludeLicenses in order to prevent confusion and better align it with the excludePackages argument. Also, the argument includeLicenses has been added for listing only packages that include the licenses listed.
Please notice: Version 1.2.2 is the last version working fine on node v12. From Version 2 on, you will need at least Node v14 to run this NPM license checker. Thanks to @daniel-schulz for pointing this out!
Ever needed to see all the license info for a module and its dependencies?
It's this easy:
npm install -g license-checker-rseidelsohn
mkdir foo
cd foo
npm install yui-lint
license-checker-rseidelsohnYou should see something like this:
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: http://github.com/chriso/cli
│ └─ licenses: MIT
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: https://github.com/isaacs/node-glob
│ └─ licenses: UNKNOWN
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: https://github.com/isaacs/node-graceful-fs
│ └─ licenses: UNKNOWN
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: https://github.com/isaacs/inherits
│ └─ licenses: UNKNOWN
├─ [email protected]
│ └─ licenses: MIT
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: https://github.com/isaacs/node-lru-cache
│ └─ licenses: MIT
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: https://github.com/isaacs/node-lru-cache
│ └─ licenses: MIT
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: https://github.com/isaacs/minimatch
│ └─ licenses: MIT
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: https://github.com/isaacs/minimatch
│ └─ licenses: MIT
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: https://github.com/isaacs/sigmund
│ └─ licenses: UNKNOWN
└─ [email protected]
├─ licenses: BSD
└─ repository: http://github.com/yui/yui-lint
An asterisk next to a license name means that it was deduced from an other file than package.json (README, LICENSE, COPYING, ...) You could see something like this:
└─ [email protected]
├─ repository: https://github.com/visionmedia/debug
└─ licenses: MIT*
Changes (see a more detailed and always up-to-date list here)
fix: Provide safe defaults for desctructured argument object
Improve the detection of URLs as licenses which are no licenses at all. Previously, when no license info could be found elsewhere, any URL in the README was taken as a custom license, which is not a very bulletproof method. Now, I restrict this method which was probably meant as a fallback solution to only being considered if the README contains at least the word "license" in some form (or notation). Not good, but better than before.
Fix --relativeModulePath not working in combination with --start.
Fix a bug that produced incorrect relative license file paths when using --relativeLicensePath together with --files and --out.
Refactor many more parts of the still old code, extracting more functionality into separate functions and files and providing more descriptive argument, variable and function names. Also, add a new test and improve the algorithm for finding licenses that are URLs - this previously used to catch image URLs thet quite often appear in the README file as licenses although license information was already correctly provided in the package.json. This part of the code is still subject to improvements, but for now it works better than before. Also, some minor bugs in the code have been fixed. All in all I did a lot of refactoring for helping me with future improvements (bug fixes and new features), as the code now is easier to understand than before (and still is a pretty big mess to me).
Add the option --clarificationsFile [filepath] for a A file that describe the license clarifications for each package, see clarificationExample.json, any field available to the customFormat option can be clarified. The clarifications file can also be used to specify a subregion of a package's license file (instead reading the entire file).
Fix list format when outputting markdown format
Change config that required the major npm version to be 8. This led to code not compiling for some users and was done for no good reason. Now it is required to be >= 8.
Fix some typos in the README file.
Due to end of service for NodeJS' security updates, I decided to from now on use a current LTS-version, which is NodeJS v18.
This of course doesn't necessarily mean that older Node versions will not be able to run this license-checker-rseidelsohn, but one day this will mosrt likely happen, I guess.
Should there be any need for security updates or new features supported by older NodeJS versions, [please tell me so] (mailto:[email protected]?subject=Support%20request%20for%20old%20license-checker-rseidelsohn%20-%20version). I can not promise that I will take the time to fulfill the request, but if you do not ask me, I certainly won't.
This being said, the only change with 4.0.0 is a switch in the .nvmrc file of the project (for developers working on this module only) from NodeJS v14 to NodeJS v18 - which again is a LTS version, a version with long time support - and some minor updates to the README file, adding stuff that was missing in the past due to a lack of regular maintenance from my side.
That then being said, I really want to invite you to add pull requests to this project. If you feel like, please ask me to give you higher-level access to this repo. I am not keen on mainaining it on my own - I just took it over in order to add my own feature request after the original author stopped finding the time to further support it. Now, I am not using this module for work any more (which might change in the future), but I see my responsibility to at least taking care of pull requests and releasing them, and from time to time working on feature requests as a kind of kata for me.
Allow combining the options --excludePackages and --excludePackagesStartingWith
Bugfix for --excludePackagesStartingWith
Add flag --excludePackagesStartingWith [list] and add detection of Hippocratic License 2.1
Add new option --limitAttributes. Example usage: node bin/license-checker-rseidelsohn --limitAttributes publisher,email will only list the publisher and email attributes for every dependency.
Fix the --direct option.
From now on, when you give the --files option, this tool outputs the path to the copied license files rather than to
the originals. When the relativeLicensePath option is given, this path will either be relative to the working
directory or - if also the out option is given - relative to the out path.
When using the --out option, you will not see output in the console, as the output goes into the file specified by
--out. When using the --files option without --out option, you will now get console output, which was not the case
before.
--angularCliis just a synonym for--plainVertical--clarificationsFile [filepath]A file that describe the license clarifications for each package, see clarificationExample.json, any field available to the customFormat option can be clarified. The clarifications file can also be used to specify a subregion of a package's license file (instead reading the entire file).--csvoutput in csv format.--csvComponentPrefixprefix column for component in csv format.--customPathto add a custom Format file in JSON--developmentonly show development dependencies.--direct [boolean|number]look for direct dependencies only if "true" or look for "number" of levels of dependencies--excludeLicenses [list]exclude modules which licenses are in the comma-separated list from the output--excludePackages [list]restrict output to the packages (either "package@fullversion" or "package@majorversion" or only "package") not in the semicolon-seperated list--excludePackagesStartingWith [list]exclude modules which names start with the comma-separated list from the output (useful for excluding modules from a specific vendor and such). Example:--excludePackagesStartingWith "webpack;@types;@babel"--excludePrivatePackagesrestrict output to not include any package marked as private--failOn [list]fail (exit with code 1) on the first occurrence of the licenses of the semicolon-separated list--files [path]copy all license files to path and rename them tomodule-name@version-LICENSE.txt.--includeLicenses [list]include only modules which licenses are in the comma-separated list from the output--includePackages [list]restrict output to the packages (either "package@fullversion" or "package@majorversion" or only "package") in the semicolon-seperated list--jsonoutput in json format.--limitAttributes [list]limit the attributes to be output.--markdownoutput in markdown format.--nopeerskip peer dependencies in output.--onlyAllow [list]fail (exit with codexclusionse 1) on the first occurrence of the licenses not in the semicolon-seperated list--onlyunknownonly list packages with unknown or guessed licenses.--out [filepath]write the data to a specific file.--plainVerticaloutput license info in plain vertical format like Angular CLI does--productiononly show production dependencies.--relativeLicensePathoutput the location of the license files as relative paths--relativeModulePathoutput the location of the module files as relative paths--start [filepath]path of the initial json to look for--summaryoutput a summary of the license usage',--unknownreport guessed licenses as unknown licenses.--versionThe current version--helpThe text you are reading right now :)
A list of licenses is the simplest way to describe what you want to exclude.
You can use valid SPDX identifiers.
You can use valid SPDX expressions like MIT OR X11.
You can use non-valid SPDX identifiers, like Public Domain, since npm does
support some license strings that are not SPDX identifiers.
license-checker-rseidelsohn --json > /path/to/licenses.json
license-checker-rseidelsohn --csv --out /path/to/licenses.csv
license-checker-rseidelsohn --unknown
license-checker-rseidelsohn --customPath customFormatExample.json
license-checker-rseidelsohn --excludeLicenses 'MIT, MIT OR X11, BSD, ISC'
license-checker-rseidelsohn --includePackages '[email protected];[email protected];[email protected]'
license-checker-rseidelsohn --excludePackages 'internal-1;internal-2'
license-checker-rseidelsohn --onlyunknown
The --clarificationsFile option can be used to provide custom processing instructions on a per-package basis. The format is as so:
{
"package_name@version": {
// Any field available in customFormat can be clarified
"licenses": "MIT",
"licenseFile": "some/path",
"licenseText": "The full text of the license to include if you need"
// You can optionally add a SH-256 checksum of the license file contents that will be checked on each run. Intended to help detect when projects change their license.
"checksum": "deadbeef...",
// Add a licenseStart and optional licenseEnd to snip out a substring of the licenseText. The licenseStart will be included in the licenseText, the licenseEnd will not be.
"licenseStart": "# MIT License",
"licenseEnd": "=========",
}
}The --customPath option can be used with CSV to specify the columns. Note that
the first column, module_name, will always be used.
When used with JSON format, it will add the specified items to the usual ones.
The available items are the following:
- copyright
- description
- licenseFile
- licenseModified
- licenses
- licenseText
- name
- publisher
- repository
- url
- version
You can also give default values for each item. See an example in customFormatExample.json.
Note that outputting the license text is not recommended with Markdown formatting, as it can be very long and does not work well with Markdown lists.
var checker = require('license-checker-rseidelsohn');
checker.init(
{
start: '/path/to/start/looking',
},
// eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars
function (err, packages) {
if (err) {
//Handle error
} else {
//The sorted package data
//as an Object
}
},
);license-checker uses debug for internal logging. There’s two internal markers:
license-checker-rseidelsohn:errorfor errorslicense-checker-rseidelsohn:logfor non-errors
Set the DEBUG environment variable to one of these to see debug output:
$ export DEBUG=license-checker-rseidelsohn*; license-checker-rseidelsohn
scanning ./yui-lint
├─ [email protected]
│ ├─ repository: http://github.com/chriso/cli
│ └─ licenses: MIT
# ...We walk through the node_modules directory with the read-installed-packages module. Once we gathered a list of modules we walk through them and look at all of their package.json's, We try to identify the license with the spdx module to see if it has a valid SPDX license attached. If that fails, we then look into the module for the following files: LICENSE, LICENCE, COPYING, & README.
If one of the those files are found (in that order) we will attempt to parse the license data from it with a list of known license texts. This will be shown with the * next to the name of the license to show that we "guessed" at it.
- ChooseALicense.com - aims at helping you in choosing an open source license for your project
- TLDRLegal.com - aims at exlaining complicated legal details of software licenses in easy to understand english