[skip ci] CI Updates

9186-9191.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 9186-9191
+=================================
+
+THIS IS AN AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED REPORT.
+SOME INFORMATION MAY DIFFER FROM THE HISTORICAL REPORT.
+THE ASSESSMENT SENT TO THE PUBLIC FORUM IS THE DEFINITIVE SOURCE OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION.
+
+The official historical report is located at https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2024-October/018099.html
+
+ID    Title                                 Result 
+---------------------------------------------------
+9186  No more stamps for Agora              ADOPTED
+9187  Gray Ribbon clarification             ADOPTED
+9188  Double Default Trouble                ADOPTED
+9189  Did you get a permit for that party?  ADOPTED
+9190  If there exists a party               ADOPTED
+9191  Back to the twenties                  ADOPTED
+
+I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals.
+
+The quorum for all below decisions was 7.
+
+VOTING STRENGTHS
+================
+
+Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted.
+#: player has voting strength 3
+$: player has voting strength 4
+%: player has voting strength 5
+^: player has voting strength 6
+
+PROPOSALS
+=========
+
+PROPOSAL 9186 (No more stamps for Agora)
+AUTHOR: kiako
+CLASS: ORDINARY
+FOR (6): Janet^, Kate%, Mischief^, Murphy^, kiako, lare290
+AGAINST (1): snail^
+PRESENT (1): juan%
+BALLOTS: 8
+AI (F/A): 29/6 (AI=1.0)
+POPULARITY: 0.625
+OUTCOME: ADOPTED
+[
+Murphy: Mischief is the Collector: Endorsement of Mischief
+]
+
+PROPOSAL 9187 (Gray Ribbon clarification)
+AUTHOR: kiako
+CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
+FOR (6): Kate, Mischief, Murphy, kiako, lare290, snail
+AGAINST (0): 
+PRESENT (2): Janet, juan
+BALLOTS: 8
+AI (F/A): 18/0 (AI=3.0)
+POPULARITY: 0.750
+OUTCOME: ADOPTED
+
+PROPOSAL 9188 (Double Default Trouble)
+AUTHOR: kiako
+CLASS: ORDINARY
+FOR (4): Kate%, kiako, lare290, snail^
+AGAINST (1): Janet^
+PRESENT (3): Mischief^, Murphy^, juan%
+BALLOTS: 8
+AI (F/A): 17/6 (AI=2.0)
+POPULARITY: 0.375
+OUTCOME: ADOPTED
+
+PROPOSAL 9189 (Did you get a permit for that party?)
+AUTHOR: Janet
+CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
+FOR (6): Janet, Kate, Murphy, kiako, lare290, snail
+AGAINST (0): 
+PRESENT (2): Mischief, juan
+BALLOTS: 8
+AI (F/A): 18/0 (AI=3.0)
+POPULARITY: 0.750
+OUTCOME: ADOPTED
+
+PROPOSAL 9190 (If there exists a party)
+AUTHOR: Janet
+CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
+FOR (4): Kate, Murphy, lare290, snail
+AGAINST (0): 
+PRESENT (4): Janet, Mischief, juan, kiako
+BALLOTS: 8
+AI (F/A): 12/0 (AI=3.0)
+POPULARITY: 0.500
+OUTCOME: ADOPTED
+
+PROPOSAL 9191 (Back to the twenties)
+AUTHOR: snail
+CLASS: ORDINARY
+FOR (4): Kate%, juan%, lare290, snail^
+AGAINST (2): Janet^, Mischief^
+PRESENT (2): Murphy^, kiako
+BALLOTS: 8
+AI (F/A): 19/12 (AI=1.0)
+POPULARITY: 0.250
+OUTCOME: ADOPTED
+[
+Murphy: oliver.n is the Collector: Endorsement of non-voter oliver.n: Inextricable
+]
+
+The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below:
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+ID: 9186
+Title: No more stamps for Agora
+Adoption index: 1.0
+Author: kiako
+Co-authors: 
+
+
+[Agora was given permission to hold stamps by P 9075, but was not reverted
+when the raffle was repealed in P 9105. Since there's no economic benefit
+to sending stamps to Agora, this is unnecessary complexity.]
+
+Amend Rule 2659 ("Stamps") by replacing
+{
+   Stamps are a category of asset ownable by players and Agora.
+}
+with
+{
+   Stamps are a category of asset ownable by players.
+}
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+ID: 9187
+Title: Gray Ribbon clarification
+Adoption index: 3.0
+Author: kiako
+Co-authors: Janet, Kate
+
+
+[This is the only rule where "unless e has done so earlier in the month"
+is used instead of "Once per month".
+
+This proposal has two consequences:
+   - Pending a CFJ (or precedent), the Tailor may be able to award two
+Gray Ribbons in the month this is adopted.
+   - In a month where the Tailor changes to a new player, e will likely
+be unable to award a Gray Ribbon if the prior Tailor had done so that
+month, where the previous version may have allowed it.
+Seeing as Gray ribbons aren't exactly a hot commodity right now, I think
+the simplicity is better than the potential extra award.]
+
+Amend Rule 2438 ("Ribbons")by replacing
+{
+    The Tailor CAN award a Gray Ribbon by announcement, unless e has done
+so earlier in the month.
+}
+with
+{
+    Once per month the Tailor CAN award a Gray Ribbon by announcement.
+}
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+ID: 9188
+Title: Double Default Trouble
+Adoption index: 2.0
+Author: kiako
+Co-authors: 
+
+
+[No numerical switch uses the "default to 0" fallback, except for
+Crystal's identity, which is always set to a different value before it
+can be used. Considering the "default to null" fallback, 5 switches
+explicitly create and define a "none" instance, and two more define
+similar values under different names ("unassigned" and "vacant"). It is
+clear then that neither of these fallbacks take on the semantic meaning
+of "a default value meant to be used".
+
+In this case, it would make more sense to unambiguously allow Crystal
+identity to default to "null", assigning that fallback the semantic
+meaning of "This switch must have a default value, but it does not
+matter what it is because it is never used in practice."
+
+Janet noted that this would break mathematical operations if a numerical
+switch ends up using the default, but under this new semantic meaning I
+believe the outcome is what is expected: since "null + 3" is undefined,
+the switch fails to be flipped, and remains "null". (Defaulting to 0, on
+the other hand, would give the guise that the default should be
+considered a usable instance.)]
+
+Amend Rule 2509 ("Agoran Numbers") by removing the following paragraph:
+{
+     If 0 is in the specified values for a numerical switch and no
+default value is otherwise specified, 0 is the default value for that
+switch.
+}
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+ID: 9189
+Title: Did you get a permit for that party?
+Adoption index: 3.0
+Author: Janet
+Co-authors: Kate
+
+
+Amend Rule 2480 ("Festivals") by replacing the final paragraph with the
+following paragraph:
+
+{
+
+A player who would be Festive if Agora's Festivity were N CAN flip it to
+N (where N is an integer greater than Agora's Festivity) with 4 support
+from other players who would be Festive if Agora's Festivity were N,
+unless Agora's Festivity has had a value greater than or equal to N in
+the past 21 days.
+
+}
+
+and by appending the following sentence to the first paragraph:
+
+{
+
+A Festival is ongoing whenever Agora's Festivity is non-zero.
+
+}
+
+and by replacing each instance of "nonzero" with "non-zero".
+
+[Removes the definition of the action of Starting a Festival, which was
+mildly redundant and, more importantly, did not have its POSSIBILITY
+secured. Cleans up some other language to be more precise.]
+
+
+Amend Rule 2481 ("Festival Restrictions") by replacing each instance of
+"nonzero" with "non-zero".
+
+[While we're here, normalize this language.]
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+ID: 9190
+Title: If there exists a party
+Adoption index: 3.0
+Author: Janet
+Co-authors: Kate
+
+
+Amend Rule 2480 ("Festivals") by replacing the final two paragraphs with
+the following paragraphs:
+
+{
+
+A Festive person is a person whose Laudability is greater than or equal
+to Agora's Festivity. An N-Festive person is a person who would be
+Festive, were Agora's Festivity N.
+
+For any integer N greater than Agora's Festivity, an N-Festive player
+CAN flip Agora's Festivity to N with 4 support from other N-Festive
+players, unless Agora's Festivity has had a value greater than or equal
+to N in the past 21 days.
+
+}
+
+[Adds onto the first proposal ("Did you get a permit for that party?")
+by rewriting the same text in slightly more mathematical language. We
+think this is clearer than the original rule, but opinions may vary. The
+two proposals are written such that this should work even if the first
+one doesn't pass.]
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+ID: 9191
+Title: Back to the twenties
+Adoption index: 1.0
+Author: snail
+Co-authors: 
+
+
+Amend Rule 2690 (Spendies) by replacing "every player is granted 15
+Spendies" with "every player is granted 20 Spendies".
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

index.md

@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
 # Assessor's Archive
 
-[Latest Assessment](9184-9185.txt)
+[Latest Assessment](9186-9191.txt)
 
 List of assessments:
 
+* [9186-9191.txt](9186-9191.txt)
 * [9184-9185.txt](9184-9185.txt)
 * [9182-9183.txt](9182-9183.txt)
 * [9179-9181.txt](9179-9181.txt)