You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see the magic when the mouse is in 1 and I move it to the right. It gets teleported (warped) to 2. However, when I am in 2, and I move it to the left, the mouse appears in 3 rather than 2. Which is, in my opinion, counterintuitive. If I am in 1, and move a couple of pixels right, and then left, I end up 860 pixels south of my original position.
If the mouse is in the right screen (say, in 4), and I want to reach something in the neighborhood of position 1, the thinking is not: "move the mouse to 2, which is logically close to 1". Instead, the thinking becomes "move the mouse to 2, then move it up".
The options closest/relative does not help here, as they seem to control the landing point from 1 to 2. But apparently there is no intervention of the tool when the edges do overlap.
In few words, the edge mapping is not bijective.
Proportional (Bijective) Mode
Is there a chance to get some sort of "full edge proportional match" mode? Conceptually, it would create something like this:
Hello.
First of all, thank you so much for this tool. This "mouse issue" is the only thing that keeps my i3wm setup away from perfect (for me).
Setup
This is my screen setup:
So they look like this (I am marking mouse positions with numbers):
The Problem
I see the magic when the mouse is in 1 and I move it to the right. It gets teleported (warped) to 2. However, when I am in 2, and I move it to the left, the mouse appears in 3 rather than 2. Which is, in my opinion, counterintuitive. If I am in 1, and move a couple of pixels right, and then left, I end up 860 pixels south of my original position.
If the mouse is in the right screen (say, in 4), and I want to reach something in the neighborhood of position 1, the thinking is not:
"move the mouse to 2, which is logically close to 1". Instead, the thinking becomes "move the mouse to 2, then move it up".
The options closest/relative does not help here, as they seem to control the landing point from 1 to 2. But apparently there is no intervention of the tool when the edges do overlap.
In few words, the edge mapping is not bijective.
Proportional (Bijective) Mode
Is there a chance to get some sort of "full edge proportional match" mode? Conceptually, it would create something like this:
Where moving in both directions, points 1, 2, and 3 match with their corresponding in the other screen.
Thanks again for the hard work and talent that you have shared with us.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: