You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the detection of links in various Markdown formats is supported, including the following:
[![img](img_link)](link)
<a href="link"></a>
[text](link "title")
However, with the increasing adoption of simplified web link formats in Markdown, it would be beneficial to enhance the detection capabilities to include the following format:
link
Problem Statement
Simplified link formats are becoming more prevalent as users opt for minimalistic Markdown syntax. However, the current implementation does not detect plain link formats, which can lead to inconsistency and lack of functionality for users relying on such simplicity.
Proposal
Enhance the link detection logic to include the simplified web link format (link) alongside the already supported formats. This improvement would ensure better compatibility with modern Markdown usage trends for users.
Request
Please consider adding support for simplified web link detection in the next update. This enhancement would align with the current trends in Markdown usage and significantly improve the tool's versatility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@AlexanderDokuchaev thnks you for the fast reaction. I also wanted to add that it would be good to detect HTTP/HTTPS regardless of the format. I noticed that many people also write without a title, etc.
Currently, the detection of links in various Markdown formats is supported, including the following:
[![img](img_link)](link)
<a href="link"></a>
[text](link "title")
However, with the increasing adoption of simplified web link formats in Markdown, it would be beneficial to enhance the detection capabilities to include the following format:
link
Problem Statement
Simplified link formats are becoming more prevalent as users opt for minimalistic Markdown syntax. However, the current implementation does not detect plain
link
formats, which can lead to inconsistency and lack of functionality for users relying on such simplicity.Proposal
Enhance the link detection logic to include the simplified web link format (
link
) alongside the already supported formats. This improvement would ensure better compatibility with modern Markdown usage trends for users.Request
Please consider adding support for simplified web link detection in the next update. This enhancement would align with the current trends in Markdown usage and significantly improve the tool's versatility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: