You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
congratulations on a very nice work. I'm having problems when reproducing the FID results of your method. Are you using the official DIV2K validation dataset for evaluation? What is the actual of your method there? Do you just take the original high resolution image (e.g., 2000x3000), downsample it and upsample to match the original resolution? Or is there some e.g. center cropping applied to first obtain the same resolution as during training? The FID values that I'm getting are around ~140 for 100 images from the original validation split.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks! I use the official DIV2K validation dataset. The image is bicubicly upscaled with this code. You can check the visual results which should be better than LQ images (obviously). If not, there must be some wrong with the upscaling.
Hi,
congratulations on a very nice work. I'm having problems when reproducing the FID results of your method. Are you using the official DIV2K validation dataset for evaluation? What is the actual of your method there? Do you just take the original high resolution image (e.g., 2000x3000), downsample it and upsample to match the original resolution? Or is there some e.g. center cropping applied to first obtain the same resolution as during training? The FID values that I'm getting are around ~140 for 100 images from the original validation split.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: