Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DIV2K reproduction #123

Open
sobieskibj opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

DIV2K reproduction #123

sobieskibj opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@sobieskibj
Copy link

Hi,
congratulations on a very nice work. I'm having problems when reproducing the FID results of your method. Are you using the official DIV2K validation dataset for evaluation? What is the actual of your method there? Do you just take the original high resolution image (e.g., 2000x3000), downsample it and upsample to match the original resolution? Or is there some e.g. center cropping applied to first obtain the same resolution as during training? The FID values that I'm getting are around ~140 for 100 images from the original validation split.

@Algolzw
Copy link
Owner

Algolzw commented Jan 10, 2025

Hi, thanks! I use the official DIV2K validation dataset. The image is bicubicly upscaled with this code. You can check the visual results which should be better than LQ images (obviously). If not, there must be some wrong with the upscaling.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants