Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Idea] Use wood blocks instead of logs for some parts of trees #127

Open
EvergreenSystems opened this issue May 19, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@EvergreenSystems
Copy link

Describe the feature

Certain trees (for example the green agate) have corners where there are exposed logs where logically there would be bark. Now that the wood blocks exist with bark on all sides, replacing those exposed blocks would provide a more logical look to the trees

Why do you think it should be added?

QOL: this is by no means a huge change, but in my opinion it would provide a much nicer and more logical visual.

Additional Context

Corners such as these are what I am talking about, the core of the log should not be exposed here
2023-05-19_13 10 47

@EvergreenSystems EvergreenSystems added the enhancement New feature or request label May 19, 2023
@Andromander
Copy link
Owner

Unfortunately, as Wood blocks are separate from Log blocks, they have to be passed in as a separate value. Due to how TreeConfiguration works, there's no way to provide two states of logs. I could possibly extend TreeConfiguration and add those values, and then add in methods to help place wood blocks, but that's just how it seems the configuration works as-is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants