Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The folder structure in the POD #23

Closed
luispc1998 opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #21
Closed

The folder structure in the POD #23

luispc1998 opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #21
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@luispc1998
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was requested by @labra to talk about the directory structure exposed in #21

As a summary of the related information in the pull request. We propose a viade/ folder in the root of the POD, here we should store the data related with the app. Inside it we will have other three folders: routes/, comments/, resources/. I believe that they are self-explanatory.

Why should we do it that way?

We could each of us (teams) have our own way to handle this, but supposing that one user used several of our apps, that would lead to a complex or even crazy structure of the user's POD data.

This is just a proposal that we consider pretty intuitive both for us and the user.

@luispc1998 luispc1998 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 23, 2020
@luispc1998 luispc1998 self-assigned this Mar 23, 2020
@luispc1998 luispc1998 linked a pull request Mar 23, 2020 that will close this issue
@Raulpemol
Copy link

Using this structure we will be able to handle shared routes exactly the same way as private ones. Using Solid permissions behind the sharing function of our applications, when reading the folder /routes, users will only see those routes which they have access to. Therefore, creating other folders for shared routes or a more complex structure to handle friends' routes is not needed.

@christianpe98
Copy link

Hi, I think there's actually already an issue to talk about this: #4

@luispc1998
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's true, we are closing this issue, and posting everything there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants