Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MICADO Check that PSFs are scaling with wavelength #58

Open
AstarVienna opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

MICADO Check that PSFs are scaling with wavelength #58

AstarVienna opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation instrument-specific Limited to a certain IRDB instrument package question Further information is requested

Comments

@AstarVienna
Copy link
Collaborator

From JvdB

"It is not obvious to me that (or how?) the PSF changes when changing filters. I would expect that the PSF has a different size in K-band compared to J-band. I know anisocado can do this properly, but I guess by default a fixed PSF is used."

While we're at it, we could add a page to the docs showing what's going on here

@AstarVienna AstarVienna added question Further information is requested documentation Improvements or additions to documentation IRDB labels Apr 11, 2022
@teutoburg teutoburg removed the IRDB label Sep 29, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To Do (Backlog) in ScopeSim-development Oct 21, 2023
@teutoburg teutoburg added the instrument-specific Limited to a certain IRDB instrument package label Nov 9, 2023
@yosata
Copy link

yosata commented Dec 13, 2023

Being reminded of this issue after looking at the development dashboard today, I remembered that I got this question answered myself when designing the cover for my thesis.

Today I quickly checked if everything still works as expected in the latest version of ScopeSIM.

In summary; yes the PSFs are scaling as expected with wavelength. See the attached Jupyter Notebook. Maybe someone else can copy/paste or modify this for the documentation.

ScopeSIM PSF scaling verification.pdf

Uhm... apparently I don't know how to add an .ipynb file to this comment. Send me an email or message on slack and I can send it directly.

@carmeloarci
Copy link
Contributor

I was inspired by Joost' notebook and I ran a similar one using MORFEO MCAO mode instead of SCAO, finding also a way to load the latest MORFEO PSFs.
MORFEO sims.pdf
Actually, in the MORFEO setup currently available for MORFEO-MICADO the I band PSF is not available, and PSF does not scale with wavelength.

@carmeloarci
Copy link
Contributor

I already passed the information, however, the latest release of the field constant psf is available at the link: MORFEO "PSF 2023"

@hugobuddel
Copy link
Collaborator

@yosata thanks for the update! Perhaps good to keep this issue open to put the information in the documentation.

@carmeloarci I missed your earlier update about the PSFs. Should we make an issue for updating the MORFEO PSFs?

@hugobuddel
Copy link
Collaborator

@carmeloarci I missed your earlier update about the PSFs. Should we make an issue for updating the MORFEO PSFs?

I suppose that would be #56

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation instrument-specific Limited to a certain IRDB instrument package question Further information is requested
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants