-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MICADO Check that PSFs are scaling with wavelength #58
Comments
Being reminded of this issue after looking at the development dashboard today, I remembered that I got this question answered myself when designing the cover for my thesis. Today I quickly checked if everything still works as expected in the latest version of ScopeSIM. In summary; yes the PSFs are scaling as expected with wavelength. See the attached Jupyter Notebook. Maybe someone else can copy/paste or modify this for the documentation. ScopeSIM PSF scaling verification.pdf Uhm... apparently I don't know how to add an .ipynb file to this comment. Send me an email or message on slack and I can send it directly. |
I was inspired by Joost' notebook and I ran a similar one using MORFEO MCAO mode instead of SCAO, finding also a way to load the latest MORFEO PSFs. |
I already passed the information, however, the latest release of the field constant psf is available at the link: MORFEO "PSF 2023" |
@yosata thanks for the update! Perhaps good to keep this issue open to put the information in the documentation. @carmeloarci I missed your earlier update about the PSFs. Should we make an issue for updating the MORFEO PSFs? |
I suppose that would be #56 |
From JvdB
"It is not obvious to me that (or how?) the PSF changes when changing filters. I would expect that the PSF has a different size in K-band compared to J-band. I know anisocado can do this properly, but I guess by default a fixed PSF is used."
While we're at it, we could add a page to the docs showing what's going on here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: