-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define record of the claim of an item claimed against PBS, RPBS, or MBS #143
Comments
Added rules on outcome, insurance, and in-hospital indicator to ExplanationOfBenefit profile Added example of reporting claim against MBS for radiation oncology treatment from Medicare repository to MHR system #143
Added rules on outcome, insurance, and in-hospital indicator to ExplanationOfBenefit profile Added example of reporting claim against MBS for radiation oncology treatment from Medicare repository to MHR system #143
Design review workshop 26/03/22 confirmed single EOB (ExplanationOfBenefit) profile is best split into an two given the targeted rules for two benefits schemes:
|
single EOB (ExplanationOfBenefit) profile is best split into an two given the targeted rules for two benefits schemes: 1. Record of completed MBS Claim for reporting purposes 2. Record of PBS | RPBS Claim for reporting purposes #143
DocumentReference example(s) for MHR system needed to demonstrate how / if these can be generated from an original upload payload for Medicare /DVA Benefits Report and Pharmaceutical Benefits Report. |
FHIR Architecture Review Outcomes on MBS set of profiles
Changes from FHIR Architecture Review complete. FHIR Architecture Review Outcomes on PBS set of profiles
Changes from FHIR Architecture Review complete. |
May 2022 QA Preview - http://build.fhir.org/ig/AuDigitalHealth/ci-fhir-r4/branches/2022May/package.tgz The FHIR R4 conformance artefacts are a set of StructureDefinitions that define the FHIR structures required, the data element definitions, and their associated rules of usage including the use of extensions and terminology. These conformance artefacts will be published in an Agency FHIR NPM package for use with FHIR and FHIR-aware tools. The FHIR package contains the validation form (JSON + SCH) of the conformance artefacts for direct use in validation operations and example resource instances that demonstrate use cases and conformance requirements. While these artefacts and their package have been developed in conjunction with this Agency FHR implementation guide – publication and release of the implementation guide is not in scope. The implementation guide is provided to assist readers and users in understanding the Agency FHIR NPM package. See http://build.fhir.org/ig/AuDigitalHealth/ci-fhir-r4/branches/2022May/index.html Development and internal design architecture review is complete, internal unit testing is underway via AN-3, Clinical Informatics peer review is underway via AN-5, AN-6, AN-7, and AN-8. |
Feedback raised during the assurance period from internal testing, CI SME design review, and NIO have been addressed. A new frozen QA Preview baseline is available. Changes from internal assurance between v1.0.0-qa-preview and v1.0.0-qa-preview2 :
ADHA profiles amended (changes listed above): June 2022 QA Preview - http://build.fhir.org/ig/AuDigitalHealth/ci-fhir-r4/branches/2022June/package.tgz The FHIR R4 conformance artefacts are a set of StructureDefinitions that define the FHIR structures required, the data element definitions, and their associated rules of usage including the use of extensions and terminology. These conformance artefacts will be published in an Agency FHIR NPM package for use with FHIR and FHIR-aware tools. The FHIR package contains the validation form (JSON + SCH) of the conformance artefacts for direct use in validation operations and example resource instances that demonstrate use cases and conformance requirements. While these artefacts and their package have been developed in conjunction with this Agency FHR implementation guide – publication and release of the implementation guide is not in scope. The implementation guide is provided to assist readers and users in understanding the Agency FHIR NPM package. See http://build.fhir.org/ig/AuDigitalHealth/ci-fhir-r4/branches/2022June/index.html Cycle 2 internal unit testing continues via AN-3. Cycle 2 clinical Informatics peer review continues via AN-6, AN-7. |
Review and testing for this profile is complete. Next step is to mark as Active v1.0.0 and pass regression testing. |
Advice provided from NIO that Service Requestor from Services Australia for MBS has never been received in the past, and is not part of the live feed design. Associated issue AuDigitalHealth/ci-medicare-records#21 raised to update live feed conformance specification. Impact to design Actions
|
#143 Includes remove of profiles that are no longer referenced by a profile in scope.
#143 Includes remove of profiles that are no longer referenced by a profile in scope.
The final baseline of the ADHA FHIR NPM package & IG is released for assurance as 1.0.0-qa-preview3. This version reflects final design agreements with NIO and Oracle and addresses feedback raised during the assurance period. http://build.fhir.org/ig/AuDigitalHealth/ci-fhir-r4/branches/2022Aug/package.tgz Changes from internal assurance between v1.0.0-qa-preview2 and v1.0.0-qa-preview3:
ADHA profiles removed as part descoping ExplanationOfBenefit.referral:
This version is undergoing internal release readiness and regression testing via AN-477, and publication readingess review via AN-431, Agency Governance review via Collaborate. |
…ad of AU base. Merge in CIL/ci-fhir-r4 from CIFMM-4158-derive-adha-core-organization-from-au-core-organization to master * commit 'd0e740f774615f56c6fe850d7db7b27d4708b745': Change in versioning as per feedback 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Derive organisation profile from HL7 AU core instead of AU base.
Prerequisites
The issue / feature
Change description
Develop and publish an payload definition for R4 of a record of the claim of an item claimed against the Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule (PBS), Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (RPBS), or Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) to provide an initial baseline as input a the piece of work to provide FHIR R4 endpoint for the exchange of digital health information recorded on the Medicare registries between individuals, healthcare providers, and the My Health Record system infrastructure in Australia.
The purpose of this exchange is to supporting data sourced from the Services Australia Medicare repositories.
Reports of completed claims for a patient against the PBS, RPBS, or MBS are uploaded from Medicare repositories to the MHR system and surfaced to patients, related parties, providers, and clinical information systems via the MHR supported access channels (National Consumer Portal, National Provider Portal, B2B Gateway, etc.).
What it actually enables people to do
How awesome would it be?
Support transition from STU3 to R4 of digital health exchanges of an individual's information in relation to the Medicare program.
Workarounds
N/A
Additional context
See the current STU 3 implementation - TBD complete this section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: