You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be good to have an SF version of the EEZ layers, probably separate in the first instance or stuff may break. For both of them it would be great if we can add some level of ID to them to make it easier to filter to set EEZ's I cant seem to see one in the data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That's equivalent to what {mregions} would get I think.
ouch, hang on - this will present in the criminally-imagined form of a "MultiSurface", when it's nothing of the sort (a kind of esri gate-keeping). I'll extract and make it useable ...
It would be good to have an SF version of the EEZ layers, probably separate in the first instance or stuff may break. For both of them it would be great if we can add some level of ID to them to make it easier to filter to set EEZ's I cant seem to see one in the data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: