Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SSF profiles in photon units (QE) or radiometric units? #8

Open
sschmaus opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

SSF profiles in photon units (QE) or radiometric units? #8

sschmaus opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@sschmaus
Copy link

sschmaus commented Mar 23, 2023

I understand that absolute units are not needed to generate a color profile, but there is still a big difference between the two for this application.

Quantum efficiency (QE) just considers the conversion efficiency of a photon into a photoelectron. On the other hand, Radiometric units consider the actual energy carried by a photon at a specific wavelength, with short wave photons carrying more energy than those at long wavelengths.

Here is an example of the difference from the CMV-20000 sensor datasheet :

Notably, this changes not only the relative scaling between the filters, but also affects the location of the response peak, accentuating longer wavelengths.
More information about the difference: https://scientificimaging.com/knowledge-base/quantum-efficiency-spec-res/

Since DCamProf is using relative units, converting between QE and radiometric spectral response should be as easy as multiplying the QE with the wavelength.

I have seen both getting referred to as the spectral response of a sensor in documents, so I'm not sure which one is the correct one to be used with DCamProf.
This isn't specified anywhere in the documentation yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant