Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarification on Directionality in stLearn CCI Plots #299

Open
gity123987 opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Clarification on Directionality in stLearn CCI Plots #299

gity123987 opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@gity123987
Copy link

gity123987 commented Jun 18, 2024

Dear stLearn Team,

I appreciate your efforts in developing such an effective tool for spatial transcriptomics analysis! As I explore the capabilities of stLearn with Xenium data, I have encountered a point of confusion that I hope you can help clarify.

I am currently utilizing stLearn for analyzing Xenium data and have a question regarding the visualization of cell-cell interactions. In my understanding, when using st.pl.ccinet_plot and st.pl.lr_cci_map, the arrowhead points to the receiver (receptor side), and the base indicates the sender (ligand side). However, the results from st.pl.cci_map with the same cell type pairings in the same dataset show the arrowhead as the sender and the base as the receiver, which seems to contradict the previous findings. This pattern is consistent with what is shown in the tutorials on stLearn documentation, where st.pl.lr_cci_map and st.pl.cci_map also depict the arrowhead as the sender. Could you confirm whether the directionality in st.pl.ccinet_plot and st.pl.lr_cci_map should indeed indicate the arrowhead as the sender and the base as the receiver?

@je71xusa
Copy link

Was there an update on this issue? Encountered the same problem today

@BradBalderson
Copy link
Collaborator

See reply to #309

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants