You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the sub-booklet section is enabled with a 20pp (which appears the default, at least after installation via Debian) then a 92pp document is broken up into a sub-booklet of 80pp plus another of 12pp.
I presume that the original intention was to allow sections to be printed for separate stitching or stapling, in which case there should be a total of 5 sections generated from 92pp.
Alternatively, if the intention was to allow e.g. 16pp to be placed on a single bifolium which was then folded this should still result in 5 sections.
I've not yet investigated the sourcecode, so don't know whether my meagre skills would allow me to tackle this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If the sub-booklet section is enabled with a 20pp (which appears the default, at least after installation via Debian) then a 92pp document is broken up into a sub-booklet of 80pp plus another of 12pp.
I presume that the original intention was to allow sections to be printed for separate stitching or stapling, in which case there should be a total of 5 sections generated from 92pp.
Alternatively, if the intention was to allow e.g. 16pp to be placed on a single bifolium which was then folded this should still result in 5 sections.
I've not yet investigated the sourcecode, so don't know whether my meagre skills would allow me to tackle this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: