-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Too much error in TriangleElement Stress Validation #84
Comments
Hi @rubsy92, I did some changes in I'm doing some edits to make it report to a HTML file instead of csv file but I need element stress at integration points which are not inside the CSV file you included. Can you please also add the rpt file to that folder? Thanks... Also if not hard, please add following items to folder (like this one)
Thanks |
Hi @epsi1on, The aforementioned link (https://github.com/BriefFiniteElementNet/BriefFiniteElement.Net/blob/master/BriefFiniteElementNet.Validation/Data/FlatShell%20-%20triangle/IBeamTorsion/Intro.md) is not working but I know the I beam example. Regarding the required element type: you need to use the STRI3-element of Abaqus if you want to compare the results with BFE. The default S3(R) element of Abaqus can be used for both thin and thick shells and I think Abaqus does some optimization in the background. Furthermore the (R) version uses reduced integration; which is definitely not the case for the triangular element in BFE. Regarding the I beam results: I performed that simulation some months ago and as far as I can remember I got consistent results with Abaqus (STRI3 element). Comparing the results must be done manually since the element numbering is not the same and this process is very time consuming… I’ll look into it later on. Regarding the clamped plate: |
Maybe no need for all nodes. I have seen some validations in thesis PDF which only compares displacement values of 3 nodes and elements, not all nodes. As you said this is time consuming to reorder nodes.
Preferably both, or at least stress components.
Sorry my mistake.
Thanks, I did recover image file from .xlsx file and added to folder. No need to recover from backups. Just for your info, as we are going to release nuget package, I need to automate the execution of validations and take a look at result, this is why i asked you the stress components. This is related project : Project#4. |
Hi @epsi1on, I was validating the I-beam and the values seem to be okay; however we need to agree on the probe location for the stresses. The "envelope" function I wrote earlier doesn't always seem to provide the same values as Abaqus. However, the stresses for the bottom/top look good. This thus goes hand in hand with the shell face orientation. I think we need to discuss how we define the top or the bottom of a shell and visualize it? Do we have the normal of the face available? Maybe I can already do an export of the stresses for all components (top/bottom/envelope) separately? |
Hi, basically you need the following files: So how would you like to compare the stresses? Do we check top/bottom separately? |
OK, included these file.
what you do suggest? i think comparison of a top and button stresses of a few elements (like 2 or 3) is enough |
Hi, I created a pull request with a comparison for top/bottom for the flat plate. Do note that there were some issues with my branch and as such I think I might have deleted the following files:
Could you check this? Also could you add the CAE/ODB file of the I beam? Then I can do the same comparison for that example. Thanks! |
Hi,
Files are already there. That is OK.
Added files to Thanks |
This is a comparison between BFE output and Abaqus output for a model which only contains triangle element. Take a look for more info:
https://github.com/BriefFiniteElementNet/BriefFiniteElement.Net/blob/master/BriefFiniteElementNet.Validation/Data/FlatShell%20-%20triangle/IBeamTorsion/Intro.md
0.7%
error in nodal displacement , which seems to be totally acceptable. Minor difference are probably caused by different formulations used in two software like the way of handling drilling DoF, or either Membrane or Bending formulations.TriangleElement
.To understand why there is such error, we must first know how abaqus handles calculations for this element and unfortunately i do not know what is the element used in this Abaqus model.
Do you guys know which element is used in this Abaqus model? I think it is
STRI3
element.I'll try to find the abaqus input file for this validation case, then will continue finding the problem.
Thanks...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: