Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to using .pngs #156

Closed
BurkusCat opened this issue Mar 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Switch to using .pngs #156

BurkusCat opened this issue Mar 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request high priority This issue would have a large impact and should be worked on before other issues

Comments

@BurkusCat
Copy link
Owner

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The site performs quite badly.

Describe the solution you'd like
By default, use .PNG files. They perform a lot better despite being larger.

Give an option to switch to a "High detail graphics (slow)" mode from "Medium detail graphics (fast)".

@BurkusCat BurkusCat added enhancement New feature or request high priority This issue would have a large impact and should be worked on before other issues labels Mar 7, 2020
@BurkusCat BurkusCat self-assigned this Mar 7, 2020
@Mr-Martinez
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm curious, could issue #111 link tie in with .png files? I did a quick read and saw that a mixture of 'd3' graph making along with html drawing can help speed things up. I'm thinking, would it speed up if we could use png's in favor of svg files in addition to using html drawing?

@BurkusCat
Copy link
Owner Author

These tickets are definitely related, but I wouldn't combine. I think both things would help improve performance. However, #111 I imagine would be a lot bigger change. So I'm only going to look at the .png changes for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request high priority This issue would have a large impact and should be worked on before other issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants