Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

JOSS review: Previous work #6

Open
benjaminbolling opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

JOSS review: Previous work #6

benjaminbolling opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@benjaminbolling
Copy link

The paper states that existing tools are either proprietary or insufficiently flexible. It would be useful to mention examples of such and why they are deemed either proprietary or insufficiently flexible, and the state of those.

Would thereafter also recommend referring to previous work in the field of data analysis software or methods for CD-SAXS.
@benjaminbolling benjaminbolling mentioned this issue Jan 6, 2025
Open
@benjaminbolling
Copy link
Author

benjaminbolling commented Jan 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Requirement for openjournals/joss-reviews#7559.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@benjaminbolling