We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create a filter/function to group identical analyses into a single entry. For example, analyses 18 and 19 of forma (Du Cange) are identical:
18
19
forma
============================ANALYSIS 18================================== SEGMENTATION: form -a ---------------------morphological feats 1 ---------------------------- --bfs-- Case: Ablative Gender: Feminine Number: Singular ---------------------morphological feats 2 ---------------------------- --nfs-- Case: Nominative Gender: Feminine Number: Singular ---------------------morphological feats 3 ---------------------------- --vfs-- Case: Vocative Gender: Feminine Number: Singular ============================LEMMA ================================= forma N1 D68HA f -----------------------morphological feats------------------------- NcA PoS: Noun Type: Common Inflexional Category: I decl -----------------------derivational info--------------------------- IS DERIVED: NO ============================ANALYSIS 19================================== SEGMENTATION: form -a ---------------------morphological feats 1 ---------------------------- --bfs-- Case: Ablative Gender: Feminine Number: Singular ---------------------morphological feats 2 ---------------------------- --nfs-- Case: Nominative Gender: Feminine Number: Singular ---------------------morphological feats 3 ---------------------------- --vfs-- Case: Vocative Gender: Feminine Number: Singular ============================LEMMA ================================= forma N1 D68HB f -----------------------morphological feats------------------------- NcA PoS: Noun Type: Common Inflexional Category: I decl -----------------------derivational info--------------------------- IS DERIVED: NO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
LemLat application has indeed a problem of grouping but in case of word-forms with both 'ordinary' and exceptional lemmatization.
NOT the case of your example where you have actually two lemmas (note the different ids).
It could be arguable (in cases like that) the choice of using two different entries in the support database.
Sorry, something went wrong.
gersh0m
No branches or pull requests
Create a filter/function to group identical analyses into a single entry. For example, analyses
18
and19
offorma
(Du Cange) are identical:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: