You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been thinking about joint transit and RV modeling. In a full joint model, one would include the following parameters
{P, tc, e, w, K, Rp/Rstar, a/Rstar, b}
some variables are informed by both datasets: {P, tc, e, w}
some are just informed by RVs: {K}
some are just informed by the transits {Rp/Rstar, a/Rstar}
However, in general P and tc are typically much better constrained from photometry that we fix-it and forget-it in RV modeling. I think we can do something similar with e and w.
One typically gets a joint constraint on e and w from transit modeling if mean stellar density is known. This could be implemented into radvel 1.4.1 using the existing functionality, but this requires a KDE evaluation.
I sketched out a solution that I think should be much more efficient and could be implemented in a straight forward manner using radvel.prior.UserDefinedPrior. See attached PDF. A project for @mason-macdougall perhaps?
I've been thinking about joint transit and RV modeling. In a full joint model, one would include the following parameters
{P, tc, e, w, K, Rp/Rstar, a/Rstar, b}
However, in general P and tc are typically much better constrained from photometry that we fix-it and forget-it in RV modeling. I think we can do something similar with e and w.
One typically gets a joint constraint on e and w from transit modeling if mean stellar density is known. This could be implemented into radvel 1.4.1 using the existing functionality, but this requires a KDE evaluation.
I sketched out a solution that I think should be much more efficient and could be implemented in a straight forward manner using
radvel.prior.UserDefinedPrior
. See attached PDF. A project for @mason-macdougall perhaps?e-w-constraints-into-radvel.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: