Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

incorporating eccentricity-omega constraints from transit modeling. #322

Open
petigura opened this issue Jul 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@petigura
Copy link
Collaborator

I've been thinking about joint transit and RV modeling. In a full joint model, one would include the following parameters

{P, tc, e, w, K, Rp/Rstar, a/Rstar, b}

  • some variables are informed by both datasets: {P, tc, e, w}
  • some are just informed by RVs: {K}
  • some are just informed by the transits {Rp/Rstar, a/Rstar}

However, in general P and tc are typically much better constrained from photometry that we fix-it and forget-it in RV modeling. I think we can do something similar with e and w.

One typically gets a joint constraint on e and w from transit modeling if mean stellar density is known. This could be implemented into radvel 1.4.1 using the existing functionality, but this requires a KDE evaluation.

I sketched out a solution that I think should be much more efficient and could be implemented in a straight forward manner using radvel.prior.UserDefinedPrior. See attached PDF. A project for @mason-macdougall perhaps?

e-w-constraints-into-radvel.pdf

@bjfultn
Copy link
Contributor

bjfultn commented Jul 24, 2020

Also see https://radvel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials/CustomModel-tutorial.html that goes through how one might set up a joint RV+transit fit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants