Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation bug/confusion with snes9x snes9x2010 cores #169

Open
fxtl opened this issue Feb 25, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Documentation bug/confusion with snes9x snes9x2010 cores #169

fxtl opened this issue Feb 25, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@fxtl
Copy link

fxtl commented Feb 25, 2018

I noticed one bug (or actually wrong documentation) in retroarch_with_cores.zip/snes9x.hmod and snes9x2010.hmod: the readme.txt in both tells to use the same script: /bin/snes <clover_args>, but actually only snes9x2010 uses it (snes9x uses /bin/snes9x).

So, if you have previously used snes9x core with /bin/snes and install both cores, you will start using snes9x2010. Is this intentional? If you only install snes9x, you would have to change all command lines from /bin/snes to /bin/snes9x.

@KMFDManic
Copy link

KMFDManic commented Feb 25, 2018

You can alternately the Snes9x Cores in my set. They all work with /bin/snes if just one is installed. Multiples can be installed using the secondary Command Lines I added.

https://github.com/KMFDManic/NESC-SNESC-Modifications/releases

@fxtl
Copy link
Author

fxtl commented Feb 25, 2018

Thanks, your set is correct with readme.txt's in snes cores. But can I update to those cores without migrating to Hakchi2 CE? I tried updating to ClusterM's 2.30 from 2.21f, but I noticed that my save states didn't work anymore. Is it mandatory to give up your save states when upgrading Retroarch and/or cores?

@KMFDManic
Copy link

My cores should work fine for you. It is the busybox that is in hakchi2.3 that will tether you to that RetroArch for now. Your prior saves are still on Nand. You should still be able to use them in some way shape or form.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants