auto extend tests - o1-mini

[mrT23]

PR Type

Tests

---

Description

• Added extensive unit tests across multiple modules to increase test coverage.
• Tests include error handling, utility functions, and specific provider functionalities.
• Improved robustness of test suite by covering edge cases and exceptions.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Tests

test_azure_devops_parsing.py Add tests for AzureDevopsProvider initialization and error handling tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py Added tests for AzureDevopsProvider initialization with valid PR URL. Added tests for ImportError when Azure DevOps is not available. +23/-1    test_clip_tokens.py Extend tests for utility functions in clip_tokens                tests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py Added tests for set_pr_string and is_value_no functions. Added tests for convert_str_to_datetime function. Added tests for unique_strings function. Added tests for get_setting function. +98/-0    test_codecommit_client.py Add error handling tests for CodeCommitClient                        tests/unittest/test_codecommit_client.py Added tests for handling file not found and repository not found errors. Added test for getting file with an empty path. +36/-0    test_codecommit_provider.py Add tests for CodeCommitProvider PR setting and capabilities tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py Added tests for setting PR with valid URL. Added tests for checking supported capabilities. +38/-0    test_github_action_output.py Add test for clip_tokens exceeding max tokens                        tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py Added test for clip_tokens function exceeding max tokens. +12/-1    test_language_handler.py Add tests for language handler file sorting                            tests/unittest/test_language_handler.py Added test for file extension not in main extensions. Added test for valid file with empty filename. +42/-0    test_load_yaml.py Add tests for YAML loading and utility functions                  tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py Added test for emphasize_header function. Added test for get_setting function with exception handling. +26/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 85

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Possible Redundancy The import of MagicMock is duplicated on lines 2 and 3. Consider removing one of these imports to avoid redundancy. Test Coverage The test for is_value_no function does not cover all possible input types. Consider adding tests for float values and more complex data structures to ensure comprehensive coverage. Incomplete Test The test_is_supported_capabilities function tests for unsupported and supported capabilities, but the list of supported capabilities is not verified against the actual implementation. Consider adding assertions to check if these capabilities are truly supported by the CodeCommitProvider.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit 3c78a7c)

Action: build-and-test

Failed stage: Test dev docker [❌]

Failed test name: test_get_setting_exception

Failure summary: The action failed because the test test_get_setting_exception in the file tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py encountered an error during its setup phase. This error caused the test suite to terminate with an exit code of 1.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 1030: platform linux -- Python 3.12.3, pytest-7.4.0, pluggy-1.5.0 -- /usr/local/bin/python 1031: cachedir: .pytest_cache 1032: rootdir: /app 1033: plugins: anyio-4.6.2.post1, cov-5.0.0 1034: collecting ... collected 103 items 1035: tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py::TestAzureDevOpsParsing::test_regular_address PASSED [ 0%] 1036: tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py::TestAzureDevOpsParsing::test_visualstudio_address PASSED [ 1%] 1037: tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py::TestAzureDevOpsParsing::test_init_with_valid_pr_url PASSED [ 2%] 1038: tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py::TestAzureDevOpsParsing::test_init_raises_importerror_when_azuredevops_not_available PASSED [ 3%] ... 1100: tests/unittest/test_find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file.py::TestFindLineNumberOfRelevantLineInFile::test_relevant_line_found_but_deleted PASSED [ 64%] 1101: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions PASSED [ 65%] 1102: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_new_line PASSED [ 66%] 1103: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_many_close_brackets PASSED [ 66%] 1104: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_relevant_file PASSED [ 67%] 1105: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_enabled PASSED [ 68%] 1106: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_disabled PASSED [ 69%] 1107: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_notset PASSED [ 70%] 1108: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_error_case PASSED [ 71%] ... 1118: tests/unittest/test_language_handler.py::TestSortFilesByMainLanguages::test_edge_case_files_with_bad_extensions_only PASSED [ 81%] 1119: tests/unittest/test_language_handler.py::TestSortFilesByMainLanguages::test_general_behaviour_sort_files_by_main_languages PASSED [ 82%] 1120: tests/unittest/test_language_handler.py::TestSortFilesByMainLanguages::test_file_extension_not_in_main_extensions PASSED [ 83%] 1121: tests/unittest/test_language_handler.py::TestSortFilesByMainLanguages::test_is_valid_file_with_empty_filename PASSED [ 84%] 1122: tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_valid_yaml PASSED [ 85%] 1123: tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_invalid_yaml1 PASSED [ 86%] 1124: tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_invalid_yaml2 PASSED [ 87%] 1125: tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_emphasize_header_no_colon PASSED [ 88%] 1126: tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_get_setting_exception ERROR [ 89%] ... 1130: tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py::TestParseCodeSuggestion::test_with_code_example_key PASSED [ 93%] 1131: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_valid_yaml PASSED [ 94%] 1132: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_add_relevant_line PASSED [ 95%] 1133: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_extract_snippet PASSED [ 96%] 1134: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_remove_last_line PASSED [ 97%] 1135: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_empty_yaml_fixed PASSED [ 98%] 1136: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_no_initial_yaml PASSED [ 99%] 1137: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_with_initial_yaml PASSED [100%] 1138: ==================================== ERRORS ==================================== 1139: __________ ERROR at setup of TestLoadYaml.test_get_setting_exception ___________ ... 1173: /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/azure/devops/__init__.py:6: DeprecationWarning: Deprecated call to `pkg_resources.declare_namespace('azure.devops')`. 1174: Implementing implicit namespace packages (as specified in PEP 420) is preferred to `pkg_resources.declare_namespace`. See https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/references/keywords.html#keyword-namespace-packages 1175: pkg_resources.declare_namespace(__name__) 1176: ../usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:2317 1177: /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:2317: DeprecationWarning: Deprecated call to `pkg_resources.declare_namespace('azure')`. 1178: Implementing implicit namespace packages (as specified in PEP 420) is preferred to `pkg_resources.declare_namespace`. See https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/references/keywords.html#keyword-namespace-packages 1179: declare_namespace(parent) 1180: ../usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_config.py:291 1181: /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_config.py:291: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Support for class-based `config` is deprecated, use ConfigDict instead. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.8/migration/ ... 1206: tests/unittest/test_bitbucket_provider.py::TestBitbucketServerProvider::test_get_diff_files_simple_diverge_70 1207: tests/unittest/test_bitbucket_provider.py::TestBitbucketServerProvider::test_get_diff_files_diverge_with_merge_commit_70 1208: tests/unittest/test_bitbucket_provider.py::TestBitbucketServerProvider::test_get_diff_files_multi_merge_diverge_60 1209: tests/unittest/test_bitbucket_provider.py::TestBitbucketServerProvider::test_get_diff_files_multi_merge_diverge_70 1210: /app/pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_server_provider.py:177: DeprecationWarning: distutils Version classes are deprecated. Use packaging.version instead. 1211: if self.bitbucket_api_version is not None and self.bitbucket_api_version >= LooseVersion("7.0"): 1212: -- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html 1213: =========================== short test summary info ============================ 1214: ERROR tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_get_setting_exception 1215: ================== 102 passed, 29 warnings, 1 error in 3.69s =================== 1216: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[mrT23]

/help "what is pr-agent"

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

Question:

what is pr-agent

Answer:

PR-Agent, recently renamed to Qodo Merge, is an open-source tool designed to help efficiently review and handle pull requests. It offers various features across different git providers like GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps. Some key features include:

1. Review: Provides adjustable feedback about PRs, including possible issues and security concerns.
2. Describe: Automatically generates PR descriptions including title, type, summary, and labels.
3. Improve: Offers code suggestions for improving the PR.
4. Ask: Allows users to ask free-text questions about the PR or specific code lines.
5. Custom Prompts: Generates code suggestions based on custom prompts from users.
6. Analyze: Identifies changed components in the PR and allows interactive application of different tools.

Qodo Merge can be used via CLI, online comments, or set up to run automatically when a new PR is opened. It supports multiple configuration options and can be self-hosted or used as a hosted service (Qodo Merge Pro).

Relevant Sources:

• https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//index#overview
• https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//overview/index#overview
• https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//tools/index#tools

[mrT23]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to 3c78a7c

Category	Suggestion	Score
Enhancement	Enhance error handling in get_file to dynamically manage different error codes Ensure that get_file method handles different error codes from botocore.exceptions.ClientError dynamically instead of hardcoding them. tests/unittest/test_codecommit_client.py [145] -api.boto_client.get_file.side_effect = botocore.exceptions.ClientError(error_response, 'get_file') +try: + api.get_file("repo", "nonexistent_file.py", "sha_hash", optional=False) +except botocore.exceptions.ClientError as error: + if error.response['Error']['Code'] == 'FileDoesNotExistException': + raise ValueError(f"CodeCommit cannot retrieve file 'nonexistent_file.py' from repository 'repo'") + else: + raise Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion enhances the error handling in the get_file method by dynamically checking the error code, which makes the method more robust against various potential ClientError scenarios from botocore.	8
	Improve error handling and robustness of URL parsing assertions Consider handling the case where _parse_pr_url might return unexpected values or raise exceptions to ensure robustness. tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py [18] -assert AzureDevopsProvider._parse_pr_url(pr_url) == ("project", "repo", 1) +parsed_values = AzureDevopsProvider._parse_pr_url(pr_url) +assert parsed_values == ("project", "repo", 1), f"Unexpected parsing result: {parsed_values}" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves error handling by checking the output of _parse_pr_url method and providing a clear error message if the output is unexpected, enhancing the robustness of the test.	7
	Implement flexible error message checking for repository existence validation Replace the hardcoded error message check with a more flexible error handling mechanism that can adapt to various error messages or codes. tests/unittest/test_codecommit_client.py [166] -assert "Repository does not exist: nonexistent_repo" in str(e) +expected_error_msg = "Repository does not exist" +assert expected_error_msg in str(e), f"Unexpected error message: {str(e)}" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion proposes a more flexible approach to error message validation, which can help in handling different error messages more gracefully and is a good practice for error handling in tests.	6
Maintainability	Refactor capability checking to reduce redundancy and enhance code clarity Refactor the capability checking in is_supported to avoid repetitive code and improve maintainability. tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py [217] -assert not provider.is_supported(capability), f"Capability {capability} should not be supported" +unsupported_capabilities = ["get_issue_comments", "create_inline_comment", "publish_inline_comments", "get_labels", "gfm_markdown"] +assert all(not provider.is_supported(cap) for cap in unsupported_capabilities), "Some unsupported capabilities are reported as supported" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: This suggestion aims to refactor the capability checking to avoid repetitive assertions, which improves code maintainability and clarity, although it's a relatively minor enhancement in the context of the entire PR.	5

---

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit 3c78a7c

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Improve exception testing by using a context manager instead of try-except Use a context manager (with pytest.raises) instead of try-except for more idiomatic and concise exception testing. tests/unittest/test_codecommit_client.py [147-151] -try: +with pytest.raises(ValueError) as exc_info: api.get_file("repo", "nonexistent_file.py", "sha_hash", optional=False) - assert False, "Expected ValueError to be raised" -except ValueError as e: - assert "CodeCommit cannot retrieve file 'nonexistent_file.py' from repository 'repo'" in str(e) +assert "CodeCommit cannot retrieve file 'nonexistent_file.py' from repository 'repo'" in str(exc_info.value) Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion makes exception testing more idiomatic and concise by using pytest.raises, which is the recommended approach for testing exceptions in pytest.	9
Enhancement	Refactor multiple assertions into a parametrized test for improved maintainability and readability Consider using parametrized tests for is_value_no to reduce code duplication and improve test maintainability. tests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py [34-63] -# Test with None -assert is_value_no(None) == True +@pytest.mark.parametrize("value, expected", [ + (None, True), + ("", True), + ("no", True), + ("No", True), + ("none", True), + ("false", True), + ("False", True), + ("yes", False), + ("true", False), + (0, True), + (1, False), + ([], True), + ([1,2,3], False) +]) +def test_is_value_no(value, expected): + assert is_value_no(value) == expected -# Test with empty string -assert is_value_no("") == True - -# Test with 'no' -assert is_value_no("no") == True - -# Test with 'No' -assert is_value_no("No") == True - -# Test with 'none' -assert is_value_no("none") == True - -# Test with 'false' -assert is_value_no("false") == True - -# Test with 'False' -assert is_value_no("False") == True - -# Test with 'yes' -assert is_value_no("yes") == False - -# Test with 'true' -assert is_value_no("true") == False - -# Test with non-string input -assert is_value_no(0) == True -assert is_value_no(1) == False -assert is_value_no([]) == True -assert is_value_no([1,2,3]) == False - Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using parametrized tests reduces code duplication and enhances maintainability, making it easier to add or modify test cases in the future.	8
	Refactor capability testing into a parametrized test for improved maintainability and readability Consider using parametrized tests for checking supported and unsupported capabilities to reduce code duplication and improve test maintainability. tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py [209-226] -# Unsupported capabilities -unsupported_capabilities = [ - "get_issue_comments", - "create_inline_comment", - "publish_inline_comments", - "get_labels", - "gfm_markdown" -] -for capability in unsupported_capabilities: - assert not provider.is_supported(capability), f"Capability {capability} should not be supported" +@pytest.mark.parametrize("capability, expected", [ + ("get_issue_comments", False), + ("create_inline_comment", False), + ("publish_inline_comments", False), + ("get_labels", False), + ("gfm_markdown", False), + ("some_supported_capability_1", True), + ("some_supported_capability_2", True), + ("another_supported_capability", True) +]) +def test_is_supported_capabilities(capability, expected): + provider = CodeCommitProvider() + assert provider.is_supported(capability) == expected, \ + f"Capability {capability} should {'be' if expected else 'not be'} supported" -# Supported capabilities -supported_capabilities = [ - "some_supported_capability_1", - "some_supported_capability_2", - "another_supported_capability" -] -for capability in supported_capabilities: - assert provider.is_supported(capability), f"Capability {capability} should be supported" - Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Parametrized tests reduce redundancy and improve test clarity, making it easier to manage and extend the test cases for supported and unsupported capabilities.	8
	Simplify nested patch statements using a single context manager Consider using a context manager for the nested patches to ensure proper cleanup and improve readability. tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py [22-24] -with patch('pr_agent.git_providers.azuredevops_provider.AZURE_DEVOPS_AVAILABLE', True): - with patch('pr_agent.git_providers.azuredevops_provider.AzureDevopsProvider._get_azure_devops_client', return_value=mock_client): - provider = AzureDevopsProvider(pr_url="https://dev.azure.com/organization/project/_git/repo/pullrequest/1", incremental=True) +with patch('pr_agent.git_providers.azuredevops_provider.AZURE_DEVOPS_AVAILABLE', True), \ + patch('pr_agent.git_providers.azuredevops_provider.AzureDevopsProvider._get_azure_devops_client', return_value=mock_client): + provider = AzureDevopsProvider(pr_url="https://dev.azure.com/organization/project/_git/repo/pullrequest/1", incremental=True) Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves code readability and maintainability by using a single context manager for nested patches, which is a more concise and idiomatic approach in Python.	7