-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lorre is extremely aggressive on the tezos-node #950
Comments
you can start by halving a couple of values in the try something like
This should essentially drop the ongoing requests to half because it will use less connections What I don't know for sure is why your tezos node should have less capacity than the one we use in our docker. Unless the node can auto-tune based on available system resources? |
@ivanopagano
whereas mainnet.json contains:
|
@ivanopagano
And it did not improve the situation. Any other idea? |
I have experimented a little more.
It still did not make a tangible difference. So as a workaround I created a new tezos-node on the same machine. So I have one that I can query and there's one for Conseil. |
Hi There, any news on this? Do you have a suggestion what to do? |
Hi, any idea what I shall do? The advises I received did not have any effect. Conseil keeps paralyzing the tezos-node. |
I got docker-compose of all those conseil+psql + tezos running for mainnet, |
Please try the latest release and let us know how it looks. There is improved logging so it should be easier to identify the root issue. https://github.com/Cryptonomic/Conseil/releases/tag/2021-january-release-35 |
@g574 @jun0tpyrc Please see the above comment about the latest release. |
Hi,
I have a tezos-node (mainnet) and Lorre and Conseil API connected.
I do not use your docker images, I run the processes myself.
My problem is that when lorre is running I can barely connect to tezos-node anymore, e.g. it takes 20 to 60 seconds to check
/chains/main/blocks/head
:My current Lorre config looks like this:
I built Lorre from the master branch today.
What can I do to make it less aggressive?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: