You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
DAOs should have a proposal type that signals that they would like to dispute a subDAO proposal. If such a proposal is created, it should pause the subDAO proposal until the parent DAO can complete deliberation.
The big design question here is:
How do we prevent someone from spamming the parent DAO with proposals of this type and in doing so stopping subDAO execution?
One suggestion might be to only trigger the pause if the proposal in the parent DAO reaches some "quorum" of yes votes. This could be configured on a per-DAO basis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
another idea might be to draw from Maker DAO's emergency shutdown module. members of the parent DAO could put up stake (with $$ value), if the deliberation was solidly rejected, they would have their stake burned. Otherwise, they would have it returned upon deliberation's completion.
Obviously, much tuning to be done here. Just an idea.
Suggested by pupmos (@siriustaikun) here.
DAOs should have a proposal type that signals that they would like to dispute a subDAO proposal. If such a proposal is created, it should pause the subDAO proposal until the parent DAO can complete deliberation.
The big design question here is:
How do we prevent someone from spamming the parent DAO with proposals of this type and in doing so stopping subDAO execution?
One suggestion might be to only trigger the pause if the proposal in the parent DAO reaches some "quorum" of yes votes. This could be configured on a per-DAO basis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: