You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It makes sense that pipe_input doesn't restrict to the first parameters #1161 and #1173 address this.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Sometimes it would be good to have the flexibility to target multiple parameters with different transforms on a local level like mutate/pipe_output do.
Describe the solution you'd like
Something like step.on_input("target_param")
Describe alternatives you've considered
Using pipe_output on th eprevious node instead of pipe_input. Stacking multiple pipe_input decorators.
Additional context
The scaffolding for this functionality is already implemented, but is disabled / needs to be tested.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It makes sense that
pipe_input
doesn't restrict to the first parameters #1161 and #1173 address this.Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Sometimes it would be good to have the flexibility to target multiple parameters with different transforms on a local level like
mutate
/pipe_output
do.Describe the solution you'd like
Something like
step.on_input("target_param")
Describe alternatives you've considered
Using
pipe_output
on th eprevious node instead ofpipe_input
. Stacking multiplepipe_input
decorators.Additional context
The scaffolding for this functionality is already implemented, but is disabled / needs to be tested.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: