Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

install path not follow FHS standard #55

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 8, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

install path not follow FHS standard #55

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 8, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. make DESTDIR="package_dir" install
2. The files will install to non standard directories.


What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

man page: should install to usr/share/man/man3
sample shell: should install to 

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?


Please provide any additional information below.

I use 'namcap' utility for checking the package path, here is the result

sockperf-svn W: Potential non-FHS man page 
(usr/share/sockperf/man/man3/sockperf.3) found.
sockperf-svn W: File (usr/etc/) exists in a non-standard directory.
sockperf-svn W: File (usr/etc/sockperf/) exists in a non-standard directory.
sockperf-svn W: File (usr/etc/sockperf/vma_perf_envelope.sh) exists in a 
non-standard directory.
sockperf-svn W: File (usr/etc/sockperf/avner-master-test.sh) exists in a 
non-standard directory.
sockperf-svn W: File (usr/etc/sockperf/avner-test.sh) exists in a non-standard 
directory.
sockperf-svn W: File (usr/etc/sockperf/avner-test-orig) exists in a 
non-standard directory.
sockperf-svn W: File (usr/etc/sockperf/vma_multiplexers_test.sh) exists in a 
non-standard directory.
sockperf-svn W: File (usr/etc/sockperf/avner-analyze.awk) exists in a 
non-standard directory.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 8 Dec 2014 at 7:59

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Thanks for reporting.
I am not sure when we'll reach handling that internally.  Feel free to provide 
a patch and we'll integrate it.

Original comment by [email protected] on 8 Dec 2014 at 8:33

  • Added labels: Pjm-Visited
  • Removed labels: Pjm-New

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant