You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
The NeuralDB is currently hard-coded to have several different fields of collections that it can write to and query from. This seems like a rigid system that might be hard to change when more input fields and sensors are added. The hard-coded nature also makes it impractical for live applications
Potential solutions
I am not really sure yet. If the community has any ideas, they are welcome to post a comment below. One way would be to make a handler that dynamically makes new fields and functions upon request. This would involve using macro-coding or polymorphic code that updates its own methods as new fields emerge. I doubt Python can do this.
Perhaps if I had a template function that modified its parameters as new fields and collections were added.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
The NeuralDB is currently hard-coded to have several different fields of collections that it can write to and query from. This seems like a rigid system that might be hard to change when more input fields and sensors are added. The hard-coded nature also makes it impractical for live applications
Potential solutions
I am not really sure yet. If the community has any ideas, they are welcome to post a comment below. One way would be to make a handler that dynamically makes new fields and functions upon request. This would involve using macro-coding or polymorphic code that updates its own methods as new fields emerge. I doubt Python can do this.
Perhaps if I had a template function that modified its parameters as new fields and collections were added.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: