Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve mean yearly wl/HW/LW #138

Closed
veenstrajelmer opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Improve mean yearly wl/HW/LW #138

veenstrajelmer opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@veenstrajelmer
Copy link
Collaborator

veenstrajelmer commented Sep 9, 2024

Old comment about mean wl/HW/LW: "vergelijking yearmean wl/HW/LW met validatiedata Anneke (opgevraagd op 28-04-2022) (nu alleen beschikbaar voor HOEKVHLD en HARVT10, sowieso wl is nodig voor slotgemiddelde), it is clear in the HARVT10 figures that something is off for meanwl, dit gebeurt misschien ook bij andere stations met duplicate times in data_summary_filtered.xlsx (also check on nanvalues that are not nan in validationdata, this points to missing data in DDL)".

Also check KWK_getcheckdata.py for monthly means of ts and ext. Are supplied to PSMSL. If we decide to correct for NAP, we have to communicate it to SLM so they do not duplicately do this. #110

Mean waterlevels were also supplied to PSMSL by RWS, were periods with many missing/invalid values excluded just like with kw.calc_wltidalindicators(df_meas, min_coverage=1)?

@veenstrajelmer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This will be investigated as part of #110, so this less-properly-documented issue will be closed

@veenstrajelmer veenstrajelmer closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant