We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Connecting a ManningResistance to a LevelBoundary is theoretically sound: there's a level to use. I think the validation doesn't allow it:
ERROR: AssertionError: node_id 102 not a Basin
Of course, the logic probably doesn't exist either... But we should at least consider adding it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's because the bottom is missing. I made this PR last week: #330. Though if you know how to actually solve it that may be better.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Could we just use the bottom of the associated node instead? I guess we have to special case it in the formulate function?
support ManningResistance and LevelBoundary (#336)
32aa36c
Fixes #334 By taking the other sides' bottom as suggested in #334 (comment) Closes #330
visr
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Connecting a ManningResistance to a LevelBoundary is theoretically sound: there's a level to use. I think the validation doesn't allow it:
Of course, the logic probably doesn't exist either...
But we should at least consider adding it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: