Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs about using MLP outputs (vs CRF) #46

Open
ebgoldstein opened this issue Oct 31, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Docs about using MLP outputs (vs CRF) #46

ebgoldstein opened this issue Oct 31, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ebgoldstein
Copy link
Member

ebgoldstein commented Oct 31, 2022

In some instances, the MLP outputs are better than those processed with the CRF:
see for example: #42 (comment)

In these instances, an operator should run use utils/plot_label_generation.py to get the MLP output, and use this instead of the CRF.

there could be documentation on this workflow.

optionally, Doodler could save both outputs, and then rely on some sort of QA/QC procedure to pick the better output..

Sniffer ( https://github.com/2320sharon/Sniffer & https://github.com/2320sharon/Streamlit_Sniffer) could have a role to play here

@ebgoldstein ebgoldstein added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant