Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluation setting in Table 1 #44

Closed
hangg7 opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Evaluation setting in Table 1 #44

hangg7 opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@hangg7
Copy link

hangg7 commented Nov 5, 2024

Hi! Thanks for open-sourcing your code and congrats on this strong project!

I am trying to evaluate and compare our method to ViewCrafter in your Table 1.
image
In your paper, you have described your setting in Section 4.2, but a few details are missing.
image

I understand you guys are going to release the evaluation code after CVPR #32. Could you please at the meantime clarify on these questions?

  1. Which CO3D, RealEstate10K test scenes do you use?
  2. What are the easy and hard set splits? I imagine subsampling with different strides, but can you be more specific?
  3. For each scene, what are the condition views and the target views?
  4. What is the resolution of the image, do you perform any resizing or cropping?

Thanks again for your time, and best of the luck for CVPR!

Best,
Hang

@hangg7
Copy link
Author

hangg7 commented Nov 6, 2024

Resolved thru email! Thanks @Drexubery!

@hangg7 hangg7 closed this as completed Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant