You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed when we migrated to the new XML format in #396, the new format includes a new structure as well as new terms for clinical classification (previously called clinical significance) for somatic and oncogenic classifications in particular. At the time we decided to postpone supporting these until we had more concrete examples to use to model them. We are now starting to see increasing numbers of these ClinVar records, so we now have these examples and it seems the trend is that it will be increasingly important to support them.
@tcezard@DSuveges@ireneisdoomed Hi all, I've looked a bit into usage of the new somatic/oncogenic classifications in the recent ClinVar dump and summarised my findings here, alongside some examples and rough schema ideas. Let me know your thoughts and questions.
As discussed when we migrated to the new XML format in #396, the new format includes a new structure as well as new terms for clinical classification (previously called clinical significance) for somatic and oncogenic classifications in particular. At the time we decided to postpone supporting these until we had more concrete examples to use to model them. We are now starting to see increasing numbers of these ClinVar records, so we now have these examples and it seems the trend is that it will be increasingly important to support them.
Tasks:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: