Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spatial and temporal resolution (or grid spacing) #209

Open
dr-shorthair opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Spatial and temporal resolution (or grid spacing) #209

dr-shorthair opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Collaborator

Does anyone have any ideas how to record spatial and temporal resolution (or grid spacing) of a dataset?
It is a pretty important parameter to determine if a dataset might be fit for a purpose - would be good to have it in the metadata, rather than having to download and inspect the data.

@mbjones
Copy link
Collaborator

mbjones commented Apr 19, 2022

Great point, @dr-shorthair I'd like to know that as well. In ISO 19115* metadata, would we expect this in SpatialRepresentationInformation#MD_Dimension, and specifically in MD_Dimension.resolution and MD_Dimension.dimensionSize? Maybe those ontology terms could be exposed in the schema.org and DCAT worlds?

@smrgeoinfo
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like something to add in Experimental.md suggestions for Array, Gridded or Coverage Data. Currently the assumption there is for continuous values specified for the dimensions, but discrete coverages were overlooked. The ISO 19115-1 MD_Dimension class provides a template. It doesn't look like OpenDAPv4, DataCube, or DDI Multi-Dimensional Format deal with data that are gridded with discrete sampling for continuous dimensions. 19115-1 is focused on data that has spatial dimensions (MD_GridSpatialRepresentation), but we need a more general solution for which the gridded continuous dimension might be space, time, chemical composition, barometric pressure, temperature....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants