You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The RDA Data Repository Attributes working group is proposing repository metadata attributes to be used in describing repositories (see their Draft Version 5), and these overlap with the ESIP science-on-schema.org guidelines for repository metadata. I did a little crosswalk to see how consistent they are, and I worked up a document for the Arctic Data Center that illustrates usage.
Here's a comparison table of how the ESIP and RDA field lists correspond.
The RDA Data Repository Attributes working group is proposing repository metadata attributes to be used in describing repositories (see their Draft Version 5), and these overlap with the ESIP science-on-schema.org guidelines for repository metadata. I did a little crosswalk to see how consistent they are, and I worked up a document for the Arctic Data Center that illustrates usage.
Here's a comparison table of how the ESIP and RDA field lists correspond.
And here's a schema.org document for the Arctic Data Center with a union of both sets of fields.
Expand for arctic-data-center.json metadata
Note that I didn't have good mappings for the following terms, which I placed in the example namespace (
ex
) for now:ex:persistentIdentifiers
ex:machineInteroperability
ex:metadata
ex:curation
ex:preservationPolicy
ex:termsOfAccess
Thoughts on whether we should make any changes to be consistent?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: