-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
~leave_here alias for 'not is_included' #120
Comments
Yes.
As a temporary workaround you could add (maybe at the top) |
Not at the moment :/ |
Yes. I already do something like that #112 (comment) |
Well, To use 'root' language, Yeah there are two 'tree' concepts to deal with: the filesystem and the inclusion tree. |
My bad, you are right Maybe we could deprecate the |
? |
I rely heavily on
not is_included
to process my devenvs. I'm assuming that this is the way it's expressed in use cases (to be useful). But thinking about the negation of inclusion is too much to think about. I find myself always having to think about it. I think it's just simpler to think about the intent of its use.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: