-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Composite schedule calculation is too high, and is not published correctly #90
Comments
For the record, it looks like raw charging profiles are stored at
And the default profile is
Now, we set a lower limit, which works.
We then try to set an overlapping schedule
which seems to reset it back to the default
As I write this out, I wonder if the issue is that we are replacing the old profile and we are not within the time range of the new profile. Let's do a quick check. |
At 20:58, sent over 25A and it was applied correctly
At 21:01, sent over 20A starting two mins earlier and it was applied correctly
at 21:05, sent over 20A starting two minutes earlier, worked
** Note that the duration of the composite schedule is only 600 secs (10 mins), although the charging profile is for an hour. at 21:15, sent over 15A starting at 21:20, initially set to default, then set to the clamped value later when the schedule takes effect
False alarm; I just didn't understand this properly! |
For the record, at the end of that time period, we do get the two entries showing when the curtailment will end
|
As outlined in EVerest#90 (comment) Signed-off-by: Shankari <[email protected]>
I have found at least two instances where the composite schedule calculation doesn't work as I expect. It could be that my expectation is incorrect; we need to follow up with the community.
Will keep this summary updated as I find other issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: