You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 8, 2023. It is now read-only.
Removed from cod4rena Kanban.
We do recognize that calls to rebalance can have it's constituent trades sandwiched, but the strategy is protected somewhat loosely by its global rebalanceRange. This protection is not exact though since there is a strange dynamic with
Peter: "the problem with the rebalanceSlippage value is that it can't be easily updated and so restricts the manager's behaviour. if they have a high slippage restriction then they have to rebalance more frequently to avoid really large trades that have higher slippage. if there is a big change, then they may have to adjust the rebalanceSlippage before they can rebalance. however, if there is a large slippage tolerance then there is more risk of skimming
but because it can't be adjusted to the current market conditions, there will always be this "looseness" where the manager has to give more room for slippage and then risks getting skimmed in an mev attack
"
This may be a difficult fix. It needs some further discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-enso-findings/issues/101
Removed from cod4rena Kanban.
We do recognize that calls to rebalance can have it's constituent trades sandwiched, but the strategy is protected somewhat loosely by its global
rebalanceRange
. This protection is not exact though since there is a strange dynamic withPeter: "the problem with the rebalanceSlippage value is that it can't be easily updated and so restricts the manager's behaviour. if they have a high slippage restriction then they have to rebalance more frequently to avoid really large trades that have higher slippage. if there is a big change, then they may have to adjust the rebalanceSlippage before they can rebalance. however, if there is a large slippage tolerance then there is more risk of skimming
but because it can't be adjusted to the current market conditions, there will always be this "looseness" where the manager has to give more room for slippage and then risks getting skimmed in an mev attack
"
This may be a difficult fix. It needs some further discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: