Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2023-09-06] [HOLD for payment 2023-09-04] Invite member - Incorrect selection of member using Tab key #25883

Closed
2 of 6 tasks
lanitochka17 opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Engineering Weekly KSv2

Comments

@lanitochka17
Copy link

lanitochka17 commented Aug 24, 2023

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify,com
  2. Go to Settings > Workspace > Members > Invite.
  3. Press Tab on keyboard to navigate to the checkbox next to the member (not the first member) and press Enter.
  4. Repeat Step 3 but navigate to the member row instead of the checkbox.

Expected Result:

In Step 3 and 4, only the selected member is selected.

Actual Result:

In Step 3, only the member in green highlight is selected, not the one selected by checkbox
In Step 4, the first member in green highlight is selected and also the member selected via Tab key

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.57-0

Reproducible in staging?: Yes

Reproducible in production?: No

If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:

Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):

Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856

Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Bug6175878_20230825_020830.mp4

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:

Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Slack conversation:

View all open jobs on GitHub

@lanitochka17 lanitochka17 added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Aug 24, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 24, 2023

Triggered auto assignment to @thienlnam (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

This appears to be caused by #22622

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

thienlnam commented Aug 24, 2023

There seems to be a few focus issues from the above - cc @thiagobrez do you have the chance to take a look here?

Also seems somewhat similar to this bug #25884

@thiagobrez
Copy link
Contributor

@thienlnam Yeah, taking a look right now!

@mountiny mountiny removed the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Aug 25, 2023
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

confirmed this si fixed in staging, no reporting bonus, closing

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Hourly KSv2 labels Aug 28, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Invite member - Incorrect selection of member using Tab key [HOLD for payment 2023-09-04] Invite member - Incorrect selection of member using Tab key Aug 28, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 28, 2023

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.57-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-09-04. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

  • External issue reporter
  • Contributor that fixed the issue
  • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

  • Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
  • Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Aug 30, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [HOLD for payment 2023-09-04] Invite member - Incorrect selection of member using Tab key [HOLD for payment 2023-09-06] [HOLD for payment 2023-09-04] Invite member - Incorrect selection of member using Tab key Aug 30, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 30, 2023

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.58-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-09-06. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

  • External issue reporter
  • Contributor that fixed the issue
  • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

  • Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
  • Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Engineering Weekly KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants