Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2023-12-12] [$1000] Chat - The green line is displayed chaotically at the recipient #27456

Closed
2 of 6 tasks
lanitochka17 opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 97 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Comments

@lanitochka17
Copy link

lanitochka17 commented Sep 14, 2023

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Go to https://staging.new.expensify.com/ on an Android (User B)
  2. Sign into Android app (User A)
  3. Send a message from User B to User A
  4. In LHN of user A, the message received will be shown in bold
    5.Open the message
    6.From user B, send multiple messages to User A

Expected Result:

As user A is already in conversation page, the green line must not be shown when messages received from user B

Actual Result:

The green line is displayed chaotically at the recipient

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.70-2

Reproducible in staging?: Yes

Reproducible in production?: Yes

If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:

Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):

Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856

Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

0-02-01-2e738be91e9bd2bfb08384aaeeda70b5f31baf0ca1f08e3082e04e5f20babf5c_da1df15568a73bb8.1.mp4

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:

Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Slack conversation:

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~018a50aa27edf905a3
  • Upwork Job ID: 1703890402212745216
  • Last Price Increase: 2023-11-11
  • Automatic offers:
    • situchan | Contributor | 27473899
@lanitochka17 lanitochka17 added Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Sep 14, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 14, 2023

Triggered auto assignment to @Christinadobrzyn (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 14, 2023

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

  • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
  • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
    • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
  • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
    • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
    • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
  • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
    • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
  • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

@Christinadobrzyn Christinadobrzyn added the Needs Reproduction Reproducible steps needed label Sep 15, 2023
@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

Christinadobrzyn commented Sep 15, 2023

I can't reproduce this going to reach back out to QA to see if they can confirm it's still happening and update the steps to reproduce.

Reaching out to QA https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C9YU7BX5M/p1694794909719529

@lanitochka17
Copy link
Author

Issue reproducible on Build 1.3.70-5
SG A50/Android11
Messages were sent one after another

0-02-01-05067e16c4a0326cb255943af9391b715c4d08c5f5610e43954c19c3dc28eaaf_4140450e3cdbcb4.1.mp4

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Sep 18, 2023
@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

Christinadobrzyn commented Sep 18, 2023

I can reproduce this... but it's not super consistent. Because of the inconsistency, I wonder if we should not fix this now and see if something else resolves it.

Using V1.3.71-2 on the Android app app Samsung Galaxy S22
Using v1.3.7 0-8 on web app Samsung

screenRecording-18-9-2023-15-54.mp4

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Sep 18, 2023
@Christinadobrzyn Christinadobrzyn added Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff and removed Needs Reproduction Reproducible steps needed labels Sep 18, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 18, 2023

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~018a50aa27edf905a3

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 18, 2023

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor Plus for review of internal employee PR - @mananjadhav (Internal)

@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

hey @mananjadhav can you give me your thoughts on #27456 (comment)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Sep 22, 2023
@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

nudge @mananjadhav on #27456 (comment)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Sep 22, 2023
@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

I tried a few times, but I couldn't. I checked on the emulator. Does it require a physical device to check?

@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

Christinadobrzyn commented Sep 26, 2023

I was using the Chrome Website on a physical Android device (User B) and messaging the Android app through Browserstack (User A).

It's not super consistent which is always tough to troubleshoot so I don't know if we should just close this and expect it will clear up with other issues.

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 28, 2023

@mananjadhav @Christinadobrzyn this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to a solution? Let's make sure we're treating this as a top priority. Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Sep 28, 2023
@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

Christinadobrzyn commented Sep 28, 2023

I updated the OP to see if that helps @mananjadhav - can you try again to reproduce and let me know what you think is best next steps here... maybe we should close since it's difficult to reproduce.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Overdue and removed Overdue labels Sep 28, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 2, 2023

@mananjadhav, @Christinadobrzyn Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@Christinadobrzyn I think you can reassign this one. I haven't been able to spend as much time as this requires.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Oct 2, 2023
@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

That PR is deployed to staging and will be deployed to production tonight. It has also been checked off successfully in QA test run. I think we don't need to hold onto that. Feel free to create a PR! 🚀

@artus9033
Copy link
Contributor

artus9033 commented Nov 21, 2023

I see, I must've confused the last messages - perfect, I will get it done, then.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 21, 2023

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

@artus9033
Copy link
Contributor

@MonilBhavsar, the PR is ready for review.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Dec 5, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$1000] Chat - The green line is displayed chaotically at the recipient [HOLD for payment 2023-12-12] [$1000] Chat - The green line is displayed chaotically at the recipient Dec 5, 2023
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Dec 5, 2023
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 5, 2023

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.7-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-12-12. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

  • External issue reporter
  • Contributor that fixed the issue
  • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 5, 2023

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@situchan] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@situchan] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@situchan] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@situchan] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@situchan] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@Christinadobrzyn] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

Christinadobrzyn commented Dec 11, 2023

preparing for payment

Payouts due:

Issue Reporter: NA
Contributor: $1000 @artus9033 (member of Callstack so not paid through Upwork or NewExpensify)
Contributor+: $1000 @situchan (in Upwork)

Eligible for 50% #urgency bonus? N

Upwork job is here.

@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

Just checking on the payment of this because there were several people working on this.

@MonilBhavsar @artus9033 and @situchan can you confirm this payment summary is correct.

Do we have a regression test for this?

@artus9033
Copy link
Contributor

@Christinadobrzyn it seems like I am listed as a paid contributor, however, I should be a contractor (member of Callstack). Could you update that please?

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

Just checking on the payment of this because there were several people working on this.

@MonilBhavsar @artus9033 and @situchan can you confirm this payment summary is correct.

Do we have a regression test for this?

Correct.

I think we already we have regression test case since reported by QA team.

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

Yes correct! We can close this once we have issued payment to everyone

@Christinadobrzyn
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome! Thanks @situchan and @MonilBhavsar - I paid @situchan based on this payment summary - #27456 (comment)

I think this is good to close but let me know if I'm missing anything!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests