Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/28342: Task description does not remove empty quotes #29144

Conversation

DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

@DylanDylann DylanDylann commented Oct 10, 2023

Details

Inconsistency bug - Assign Task - Task description does not remove empty quotes (works fine in private notes)

Fixed Issues

$ #28342
PROPOSAL: #28342 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open the app
  2. Open task report or assign any user task and open the report
  3. Open description
  4. Enter text with multiple empty quotes eg:
> Hello
>
> 
  1. Save the description and observe that description displays only one quote with text on task page (which is correct)
  2. Again open description and observe that extra greater then signs are removed
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Open the app
  2. Open task report or assign any user task and open the report
  3. Open description
  4. Enter text with multiple empty quotes eg:
> Hello
>
> 
  1. Save the description and observe that description displays only one quote with text on task page (which is correct)
  2. Again open description and observe that extra greater then signs are removed
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screencast.from.10-10-2023.13.23.11.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-chrome-quote.mp4
iOS: Native
native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

DylanDylann commented Oct 10, 2023

@DylanDylann DylanDylann marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2023 09:50
@DylanDylann DylanDylann requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2023 09:50
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from robertKozik and removed request for a team October 10, 2023 09:50
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 10, 2023

@robertKozik Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor

@DylanDylann why don't we preview the html on android native? It sticks to the

> Hello
>
>

rather then format properly or even remove the excessive quotes?

image

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann why don't we preview the html on android native? It sticks to the

> Hello
>
>

rather then format properly or even remove the excessive quotes?

image

Updated and this is the result:

Screencast.from.11-10-2023.01.01.24.webm

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor

@DylanDylann We are getting now strange margin on top of rendered HTML, it's diffrent on other platforms - can we do sth with it?

image

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

DylanDylann commented Oct 10, 2023

@DylanDylann We are getting now strange margin on top of rendered HTML, it's diffrent on other platforms - can we do sth with it?

  • Currently, in staging, we are having the bug "Description does not display properly in Android native platform". You can verify it.
  • When implementing this PR, I encountered this issue and tried to fix this but it led to the strange margin as you mentioned. So I think, I will revert all the logic used to fix the bug "Description does not display properly in Android native platform" and create a separate issue because the scope of this is only about "Task description does not remove empty quotes". What do you think @robertKozik ?

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor

@DylanDylann We are getting now strange margin on top of rendered HTML, it's diffrent on other platforms - can we do sth with it?

  • Currently, in staging, we are having the bug "Description does not display properly in Android native platform". You can verify it.
  • When implementing this PR, I encountered this issue and tried to fix this but it led to the strange margin as you mentioned. So I think, I will revert all the logic used to fix the bug "Description does not display properly in Android native platform" and create a separate issue because the scope of this is only about "Task description does not remove empty quotes". What do you think @robertKozik ?

Has this issue already been reported? I'm fine with creating a separate bug report for it, but we should still address the problem of displaying the description with excessive quotes on android native, which should undoubtedly be part of this.

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@robertKozik

Has this issue already been reported?

I am not sure about it. Will check when I have a chance

I'm fine with creating a separate bug report for it,

Yeah. Let's wait internal team to confirm this #28342 (comment)

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@robertKozik Please help review the current change and we will create another issue to fix the markdown in android

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor

As I see we didn't get the confirmation from internal team about the creation of another issue about the markdown on android native - I had review the current state of the PR before, so if we agree on proceeding with it I'll post the reviewer PR quickly

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @robertKozik

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@robertKozik internal team has confirmed here #28342 (comment). Let's continue reviewing this PR

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
android.-.web.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
ios.web.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
android.native.mov
Android
ios.native.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@robertKozik robertKozik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from iwiznia October 19, 2023 08:50
@@ -91,7 +94,7 @@ function NewTaskDescriptionPage(props) {
>
<View style={styles.mb5}>
<TextInput
defaultValue={props.task.description}
defaultValue={parser.htmlToMarkdown(parser.replace(props.task.description))}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huh? Why are we converting to HTML and back to markdown?? This was not part of the proposal, was it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann DylanDylann Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have mentioned in this #29144 (comment)

So when submitting the description to BE, I keep using the original logic (let BE save the mark down string) rather than convert mark down to HTML.

Copy link
Contributor

@iwiznia iwiznia Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmmm but comments are saved in the DB as html, no? So this would mean saving things differently than for comments? That does not sound correct...right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Yeah. Comments and Privates notes are saved on BE side as HTML. As I mentioned above, with the description, I found out that if we let BE store the HTML, for example,
    Hello
    123, it just stores as "Hello123"
  • So if we want to store description as HTML, we need the BE fix

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I don't think we would want to save html in one place and markdown in the other.... can you comment on the OG issue what changes would need to be done in the backend please?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@iwiznia just requested confirm here #28342

@DylanDylann DylanDylann force-pushed the fix/28342-task-description-does-not-remove-empty-quotes branch from 5b9f5a8 to daf413c Compare November 16, 2023 03:02
@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@iwiznia Please help review this PR again. Please note that we will use the solution that I mentioned before #29144 (comment)

@iwiznia iwiznia merged commit aacc1d4 into Expensify:main Nov 16, 2023
15 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.1-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants