[HOLD for payment 2023-10-24] [$125] Bank Account - Some menu items left icon alignment is broken

[kbecciv]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.3.84.1
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @Pujan92
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1697378426782819

Action Performed:

1. Go to any workspace -> Click Bank account
2. On the bank account step observe the left icon for
   • Connect online with plaid
   • Connect manually

Expected Result:

Left icon should be aligned on same place for all menu items

Actual Result:

Left icon is misaligned for connect manually button

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Recording.5003.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

View all open jobs on GitHub

[kbecciv]

Proposal by: @Pujan92
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1697378426782819

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Menu items left icon alignment is not consistent

What is the root cause of that problem?

It seems a regression from PR where left padding has been removed from cardMenuItem which we have used for this kind of buttons. Earlier we had the left padding of 8px.
https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/26406/files#diff-8ab8ba45ab927f1430b8d1209d187e003a9cdfe476f809e4483ef64cdba253ebL3080

App/src/styles/styles.ts

Lines 3143 to 3144 in 0b06446

	cardMenuItem: {
	paddingLeft: 0,

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

Correct the paddingLeft with 8px like the same it was earlier. Bcoz I see that class isn’t used in the offended PR. Might be changed unintentionally. cc: @pac-guerreiro
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/14358475/594432d1-70d6-4188-9093-6a52863fc471

[OSBotify]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @arosiclair (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Unable to auto-create job on Upwork. The BZ team member should create it manually for this issue.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @ntdiary (External)

[melvin-bot]

Unable to auto-create job on Upwork. The BZ team member should create it manually for this issue.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @puneetlath (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[melvin-bot]

Current assignee @ntdiary is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Could not update price automatically because there is no linked Upwork Job ID. The BZ team member will need to update the price manually in Upwork.

[mountiny]

Creating the PR

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.84-10 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [CP Staging] Add padding left back to cardMenuItem #29677

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-23. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @ntdiary requires payment
• @Pujan92 requires payment

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@puneetlath] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.84-10 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [CP Staging] Add padding left back to cardMenuItem #29677

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-23. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @ntdiary requires payment
• @Pujan92 requires payment

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@puneetlath] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[ntdiary]

Note: no need to pay me.

[puneetlath]

Looks like we just need payment for @Pujan92 for bug reporter on this one.

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.85-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [CP Staging] Add padding left back to cardMenuItem #29677

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-24. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @ntdiary requires payment
• @Pujan92 requires payment

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@puneetlath] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[mountiny]

No checklist are needed here as a deploy blocker the offending pr has been identified and we do not need regression test for this one either imho

[puneetlath]

So only the bug reporter needs payment here, is that right @mountiny?

[mountiny]

Correct @Pujan92 $50

[puneetlath]

@Pujan92 sent you an offer here: https://www.upwork.com/nx/wm/offer/27370555

Please comment on this issue once you've accepted it.

[Pujan92]

@puneetlath Accepted! Linking a comment here where @mountiny proposed $100 if that is considered.

[puneetlath]

Thanks for the link. Paid!