[HOLD for payment 2024-01-22] Check for the presence of reports that require attention and reports with errors in a given workspace.

[hayata-suenaga]

Implement a utility function that, given a workspace id, figures out if a workspace has any unread chats or chats with reports.

Find a best, existing file or create one to write this utility function.

Relevant design doc section

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @WojtekBoman

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @twisterdotcom (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.

[twisterdotcom]

Going to ⭐ you @hayata-suenaga.

[hayata-suenaga]

wait what's the star ⭐ ?

[twisterdotcom]

Yeah!

[hayata-suenaga]

We are waiting for SWM to decide which engineer to assign to this issue.

[WojtekBoman]

@hayata-suenaga You can assign me to this :)

[hayata-suenaga]

Copy from a Slack message

@wojciech.boman
please assume that there is a backend API that returns the list of members of a given workspace while you work on the GH issue. (you need to iterate over reports belonging for a given workspace to figure out if we need to display RBR/GBR. To do this, we first need to get the list of all reports that belong to the given workspace. For reports that has the policyId attribute, this is easy because we can just look at it to figure out if the report belongs to the given workspace (i.e. policy). However, for DM and Group DM reports, we consider a report as belonging to a workspace if at least one of the participants of the report is a member of the given workspace. To figure out this, you need the member list of the workspace. This is the piece of information we lack currently on the front end. That's why we have to create a new backend API to fetch it.

[melvin-bot]

@twisterdotcom, @WojtekBoman, @hayata-suenaga Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

[aldo-expensify]

Prepared draft PR with changes https://github.com/Expensify/Web-Expensify/pull/40429

[melvin-bot]

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @twisterdotcom, @WojtekBoman, @aldo-expensify, @hayata-suenaga eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

[hayata-suenaga]

The PR was merged and deployed to staging. I'll close this issue once the code is deployed to production.

also, I unassigned myself as Aldo worked on the PR

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.24-8 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [NoQA] Add BrickRoadsUtils #33239

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-01-22. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @WojtekBoman does not require payment (Contractor)

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@WojtekBoman] Please propose regression test steps to ensure the new feature will work correctly on production in further releases.
• [@twisterdotcom] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

[mountiny]

This is completed and merged to the feature branch, great work!