[HOLD for payment 2024-01-03] [HOLD for payment 2024-01-02] The new search component is slower and animation to open it isn’t smooth

[m-natarajan]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.14.1
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @puneetlath
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1703015444761109

Action Performed:

1. Open app
2. Tap search button

Expected Result:

Search page opens without delay and animation is smooth

Actual Result:

The new search component seems to be a little slower. The animation to open it isn’t smooth and it just feels a little sluggish

Workaround:

unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Untitled.mov

Recording.2623.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @stephanieelliott (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @deetergp (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

[deetergp]

It seems very likely that the new Search Input Component is the culprit https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/32439/files

[jasperhuangg]

@deetergp it seems the PR you linked only adds a new Search component to the storybook, and not the actual app, so I'm doubtful as to whether that is the cause.

[jasperhuangg]

I suspect #33218 is related, since it has to do with the animation of opening the left hand search pane.

[jasperhuangg]

This was actually fixed by this revert: #33297 closing

[deetergp]

A lot of the changes from

[jasperhuangg]

@deetergp I was wrong, I think it might have actually been caused by us moving the Search Page to the LHN

[deetergp]

Should we revert it then? Did you check out the performance of both staging and prod? They really don't feel that different to me. Neither seem slower than they've ever been to me.

[jasperhuangg]

@deetergp there's a pretty distinct delay on staging when you first open the search page (it needs to be on a fresh tab, so if it isn't happening for you close the tab and reopen it)

Notice the URL changes (that indicates that I've clicked the search button), and then a few seconds later the search page opens.

Untitled.mov

[jasperhuangg]

I have no idea why this is happening–I'm going to remove the deploy blocker label for now but this is definitely something we need to fix.

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[mountiny]

This is still an issue, seems like we have narrowed it down for changes in the phone number regex

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.16-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Revert "Merge pull request #32473 from software-mansion-labs/ideal-na… #33406
• [CP Staging] Revert "fix: treat certain US numbers as invalid" #33496

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-01-02. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@mountiny] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@mountiny] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@mountiny] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@mountiny] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@mountiny] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@stephanieelliott] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.17-8 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [CP Staging] Revert "fix: treat certain US numbers as invalid" #33496

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-01-03. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@mountiny] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@mountiny] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@mountiny] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@mountiny] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@mountiny] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@stephanieelliott] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[mountiny]

This can be closed now I think