Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[$500] Web - Wallet - BlockingViews component has grey background and another animation #33905

Closed
1 of 6 tasks
kbecciv opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 30 comments
Closed
1 of 6 tasks
Assignees
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors

Comments

@kbecciv
Copy link

kbecciv commented Jan 3, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.21-1
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:

Issue found when executing PR #32253

Action Performed:

  1. Go to URL https://staging.new.expensify.com/
  2. Login with any account
  3. Go to Settings -> Wallet -> Press Enable wallet

Expected Result:

The BlockingViews component has a white background and same animation as in PR's video

Actual Result:

The BlockingViews component has a grey background and another animation as in PR`s video and prod

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

image

Bug6331621_1704312088476.bandicam_2024-01-03_15-11-09-739.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01c2760f292f8f6de8
  • Upwork Job ID: 1742949003985174528
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-01-18
@kbecciv kbecciv added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Jan 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @Beamanator (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

@cdOut @0xmiroslav @joelbettner it looks like this could have been caused due to your typescript migration PR: #32253

Anyone free to take a look? I'd prefer not to revert if possible

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

This feels like it can be fixed as a follow up as it is a small UI issue.

@marcaaron marcaaron added Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. and removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Hourly KSv2 labels Jan 3, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @MitchExpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

  • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
  • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
    • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
  • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
    • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
    • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
  • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
    • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
  • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

@Beamanator Beamanator removed the Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. label Jan 3, 2024
@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm ya this doesn't seem like a blocker if it's just a style / animation diff... Also i don't see how that would have been changed by the linked typescript PR, may have another cause

@Beamanator Beamanator added the Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. label Jan 3, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Current assignee @MitchExpensify is eligible for the Bug assigner, not assigning anyone new.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

  • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
  • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
    • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
  • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
    • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
    • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
  • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
    • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
  • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

I did NOT mean to remove the bug label...

1 similar comment
@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

I did NOT mean to remove the bug label...

@cdOut
Copy link
Contributor

cdOut commented Jan 4, 2024

@cdOut it looks like this could have been caused due to your typescript migration PR: #32253

@Beamanator I will look into whether this is an issue caused by my PR and get back to you.

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Jan 4, 2024

@Beamanator Please assign me here as C+. I will check too

@Beamanator Beamanator added the External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor label Jan 4, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Web - Wallet - BlockingViews component has grey background and another animation [$500] Web - Wallet - BlockingViews component has grey background and another animation Jan 4, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 4, 2024

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01c2760f292f8f6de8

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Jan 4, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 4, 2024

Current assignee @0xmiroslav is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor

tienifr commented Jan 4, 2024

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

The BlockingViews component has a grey background and another animation as in PR`s video and prod

What is the root cause of that problem?

We're not applying custom color to the Plaid overlay so it has default gray color.

I'm not sure which PR causes this but it seems related to Plaid sandbox mode, we might have changed the token/Plaid settings on server side.

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

Apply custom color (likely white, can use same color as on prod) to the Plaid overlay. We can target via CSS.

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

We can customize the background color per theme if we want to.

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Jan 5, 2024

This was deploy blocker and fully frontend change so I believe offending PR can be found.

@cdOut
Copy link
Contributor

cdOut commented Jan 5, 2024

After reviewing it seems like this is the correct behaviour. When using the staging web version of the app we by default have the preferences option "Use Staging Server" enabled, causing the Plaid connections to use the sandbox version for testing, which has limited animations and a different background. If we switch the staging server option off, we get the production version.

In short, this isn't a bug and is the correct behavior for when you are using the staging server for Plaid connections. If you want the production version on the staging web app, you have to switch that option off in Preferences as shown in video.

Screen.Recording.2024-01-05.at.16.33.32.mov

@cdOut
Copy link
Contributor

cdOut commented Jan 8, 2024

cc: @Beamanator @0xmiroslav

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Jan 8, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 8, 2024

@Beamanator, @MitchExpensify, @0xmiroslav Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

In short, this isn't a bug and is the correct behavior for when you are using the staging server for Plaid connections.

Do you think @cdOut is right about this being expected? @Beamanator @marcaaron

The grey background certainly seems to be the case in OldDot on staging too

image

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Jan 8, 2024
@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Ooh iiiinteresting - that's a very good point, probably a "Sandbox mode" thing! That does make sense to me, can we make sure TestRail is updated so we don't create issues like this again in the future?

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

MitchExpensify commented Jan 10, 2024

can we make sure TestRail is updated so we don't create issues like this again in the future?

@kbecciv do you think we need to update anything in TestRail to avoid Sandbox causing us to think this is a bug again?

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 11, 2024

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly bump on the above @kbecciv

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Jan 16, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 17, 2024

@Beamanator @MitchExpensify @0xmiroslav this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to approving a proposal? If not, what's blocking us from getting this issue assigned? Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks!

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 17, 2024

@Beamanator, @MitchExpensify, @0xmiroslav Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Jan 17, 2024

Not overdue

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Jan 17, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 18, 2024

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Jan 19, 2024
@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Confirmed with @kbecciv that this wasn't caught via TestRail, its was caught in this PR, so we don't have to update anything - Closing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants