-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Payment due][$1000] Room - Side panel does not close when clicking outside of panel #34394
Comments
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~011ab450f9ef4bcadd |
Triggered auto assignment to @kadiealexander ( |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @hoangzinh ( |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Room - Side panel does not close when clicking outside of panel What is the root cause of that problem?We are only hiding picker modal when App/src/components/ValuePicker/index.js Lines 59 to 61 in 63ed47d
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?Option 1: Option 2: Option 3:
Resultworkspace_modal_hide.mp4Alternative:We will make this a page on the RHP (Exactly like #26742). We will:
|
Feel like it's expected instead a bug. |
📣 @yuetong3yu! 📣
|
Contributor details |
✅ Contributor details stored successfully. Thank you for contributing to Expensify! |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Room - Side panel does not close when clicking outside of panel What is the root cause of that problem?The workspace picker is rendered as a modal here, so on clicking outside, it dismisses. We have it in RHP but not on a route causing unexpected behaviour. It looks like a Right Hand Panel, but acts like a modal, breaking user expectations. We should add it to a route exactly how we refactored Currency Selection modal, Year Picker (pr up) and Country Picker modal (all these had the same issue). What changes do you think we should make in orderWe will make this a page on the RHP (Exactly like #26742). We will:
|
@Krishna2323 @neonbhai Thanks for your proposals. @neonbhai's proposal looks good to me. It aligns with our discussion in this issue #23725 (comment) Link to proposal #34394 (comment) 🎀👀🎀 C+ reviewed |
Triggered auto assignment to @danieldoglas, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details. |
@hoangzinh, could you please review the details here? It mentions that |
@hoangzinh friendly bump to have a look at this #34394 (comment). |
@danieldoglas bump! |
@kadiealexander please let me review @Krishna2323's comment here #34394 (comment) before we go with selected proposal. |
@danieldoglas what do you think about @Krishna2323's proposal? I just looked at the code and found that the |
@danieldoglas, @hoangzinh, @kadiealexander Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
Thanks for the discussion here. Though I agree @Krishna2323 proposals would also solve the issue, I think that @neonbhai's proposal follows the practices we've implemented in other places already. |
Reached production last week, soon it will be ready for payment. |
@danieldoglas ah we still have a follow-up PR to improve current behavior here #38711. Could you help to change label from "Awaiting Payment" -> "Reviewing"? Thanks |
This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @danieldoglas, @hoangzinh, @kadiealexander, @Krishna2323 eroding to Monthly issue. P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do! |
We're still discussing on the follow-up PR #38711 |
@kadiealexander @dangrous I think we can process payment here and close this issue because the regression issue is just closed #38665 (comment) |
@kadiealexander, friendly bump for payments. |
Since there was a regression, reducing the payment by 50% as per the contributing guidelines. Payouts due:
Upwork job is here. |
@danieldoglas @kadiealexander @hoangzinh, IMO there should be no reduction in payment since the regression was minor and we ended up doing nothing there. I have put a lot of effort into this issue, first in this PR, then in the second PR, and then I have invested a lot of time into the PR to fix the regression, which had no straightforward solution because we didn't want to create separate screens. See #38665 (comment). Pls correct me if I'm wrong here 🙃 |
@danieldoglas I'll let you decide if the regression penalty should apply here, as I don't have the technical understanding to know if the regression was true. |
I agree we can't skip the reduction because of the effort applied. |
Thanks Daniel! |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 1.4.24-4
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Side panel should close as it does when clicking on outside of the panel anywhere in the app
Actual Result:
Side panel stays open but navigates one step back
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6339423_1705008289448.clickingOnOutsideBoxRoom.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @kadiealexanderThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: