[HOLD for payment 2024-02-14] [$500] New Workspace button does not work

[mountiny]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: v1.4.36-1
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @shawnborton
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

Break down in numbered steps

1. Sign up to an account which does not have any workspace yet
2. Click the wrench to go to Settings
3. Go to workspaces
4. Click the New Workspace button in the big section block
5. Verify the workspace got created

Expected Result:

Describe what you think should've happened

Actual Result:

Describe what actually happened

Workaround:

Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~019da9053a5e89dbe2
• Upwork Job ID: 1754522202320949248
• Last Price Increase: 2024-02-05
• Automatic offers:
• ishpaul777 | Contributor | 28142786

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @jliexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Current assignee @mountiny is eligible for the Engineering assigner, not assigning anyone new.

[mountiny]

PR in review

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~019da9053a5e89dbe2

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @cubuspl42 (External)

[melvin-bot]

📣 @ishpaul777 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app!

Offer link
Upwork job
Please accept the offer and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑‍💻
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖

[mountiny]

This was fixed

[jliexpensify]

Upworks job closed

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.37-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [CP Staging] Fix a type in a prop name #35622

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-02-14. 🎊

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@mountiny] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@mountiny] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@mountiny] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@mountiny] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@mountiny] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[s77rt]

• The PR that introduced the bug has been identified: [Wave 8] Ideal nav  #33280
• The offending PR has been commented on: [Wave 8] Ideal nav  #33280 (comment)
• A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started: n/a
• Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug: No

[mountiny]

Thanks!