Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expense - Missing react & reply in thread for system message in one transaction report view #39459

Closed
6 tasks done
kbecciv opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed
6 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
Daily KSv2 Engineering Improvement Item broken or needs improvement.

Comments

@kbecciv
Copy link

kbecciv commented Apr 2, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.59-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to workspace chat that has no unsettled report.
  3. Create a manual request.
  4. Click on the request preview to go to one transaction report view.
  5. Edit the amount or any other field.
  6. Right click on the system message.
  7. Note that there is no option to react and reply in thread.
  8. Create a second request.
  9. Go to transaction thread of first request.
  10. Right click on the system message.
  11. Now there is option to react and reply in thread.

Expected Result:

System message for request edit should have the option to react and reply in thread in one transaction report view.

Actual Result:

System message for request edit does not have the option to react and reply in thread in one transaction report view.

Workaround:

n/a

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6436003_1712087675810.20240403_034941.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

@kbecciv kbecciv added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Apr 2, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Hourly KSv2 label Apr 2, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @thienlnam (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@kbecciv
Copy link
Author

kbecciv commented Apr 2, 2024

We think that this bug might be related to #wave-collect - Release 1

@mountiny mountiny added Daily KSv2 and removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Hourly KSv2 labels Apr 3, 2024
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Apr 3, 2024

I dont think this has to be a blocker cc @NikkiWines

Its not really blocking users so much they can normally comment in the report they are in.

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Apr 3, 2024

@NikkiWines I think it might be tricky to allow threading from that comment, as its technically on different report than you are seeing. Going to that thread (which cannot be created now), we would need to make sure the report header links to the expense report and not to the thansaction thread 🤔

@mountiny mountiny pinned this issue Apr 3, 2024
@mountiny mountiny unpinned this issue Apr 3, 2024
@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

NikkiWines commented Apr 3, 2024

Oof, yeah that's another complexity I don't think we considered when designing this view. We might need to raise in slack the best way to handle this 🤔 I didn't even realize you could comment on system messages 😅

But yes for now, not a blocker.

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

NikkiWines commented Apr 5, 2024

I'm actually not seeing this behavior any more on staging, though i might be seeing a new bug where threads created on the transaction-level system messages can't be deleted. But we also had a bug around deleting messages show up recently so I'm not sure if it's specific to this view or not

(threading and reacting)

Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.10.59.53.mov

(trying to delete the response)

Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.11.00.29.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Apr 5, 2024
@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

@NikkiWines Can I reassign this to you since it seems like you have the context for this?

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Apr 5, 2024
@NikkiWines NikkiWines assigned NikkiWines and unassigned thienlnam Apr 5, 2024
@NikkiWines NikkiWines added the Improvement Item broken or needs improvement. label Apr 5, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Apr 8, 2024
@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

Confirmed that the re-appearing deleted comment occurs on both the single and multiple transaction reports, so it's not a bug tied to the one-transaction view. Looks like we can close this out since the react + reply functionality works fine in both views 👍

(Standard (multiple) transaction report)

Screen.Recording.2024-04-08.at.11.20.29.mov

(One-transaction report)

Screen.Recording.2024-04-08.at.11.17.37.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Daily KSv2 Engineering Improvement Item broken or needs improvement.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants