-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[$250] RBR - No RBR is shown on LHN for combined IOU with a violation #44879
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @muttmuure ( |
@muttmuure FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors |
We think that this bug might be related to #vip-vsp |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.There is no RBR for one transaction report when there is a violation. What is the root cause of that problem?The RBR will show if there are errors or violations. Line 280 in 36e9217
The app will check the violations from the current report and its parent report action.
However, because we are checking the one-transaction report (or the expense report), the violations are empty. What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We should check the transaction thread report violations if it's a one-transaction report. To do that, we need to pass the thread report and the thread parent report action from LHNOptionsList down to OptionRowLHNData. App/src/components/LHNOptionsList/LHNOptionsList.tsx Lines 115 to 140 in 36e9217
Then, we prioritize of using the transaction thread report and transaction thread parent report action here.
|
@muttmuure Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
@muttmuure Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this? |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~015f3eae4bbca8b711 |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @rayane-djouah ( |
@muttmuure, @rayane-djouah Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
Not reproducible on staging: cc @muttmuure |
📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸 |
@muttmuure @rayane-djouah this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to approving a proposal? If not, what's blocking us from getting this issue assigned? Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks! |
@muttmuure, @rayane-djouah Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
@muttmuure - We can close this one |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 9.0.4.0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Issue found when executing PR #43502
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
RBR gets shown on LHN of the transaction thread with a violation
Actual Result:
No RBR is being shown on the LHN of the transaction thread with a violation
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6533104_1720098042352.bandicam_2024-07-04_12-24-23-366.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @rayane-djouahThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: